On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:26:50PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Just a side note, for future reference, this title lacks a verb and is
> thus not self-describing:
>
>x86/efi: Runtime services virtual mapping
>
> It should probably have been something like:
>
>x86/efi: Implement and enabl
* Matt Fleming wrote:
> Folks, could you queue up the following for the v3.14 merge window? It
> would be good to get these patches into linux-next for a full release
> cycle of testing. They pass all of my tests.
>
> The following changes since commit 72548e836b0c4abbb652e791dee9c91203a9a4c6:
Folks, could you queue up the following for the v3.14 merge window? It
would be good to get these patches into linux-next for a full release
cycle of testing. They pass all of my tests.
The following changes since commit 72548e836b0c4abbb652e791dee9c91203a9a4c6:
x86/efi: Add EFI framebuffer ear
On Mon, 11 Nov, at 12:17:54PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> > Folks, could you queue up the following for the v3.14 merge window? It
> > would be good to get these patches into linux-next for a full release
> > cycle of testing. They pass all of my tests.
> >
> > The followi
* Matt Fleming wrote:
> Folks, could you queue up the following for the v3.14 merge window? It
> would be good to get these patches into linux-next for a full release
> cycle of testing. They pass all of my tests.
>
> The following changes since commit 72548e836b0c4abbb652e791dee9c91203a9a4c6:
Folks, could you queue up the following for the v3.14 merge window? It
would be good to get these patches into linux-next for a full release
cycle of testing. They pass all of my tests.
The following changes since commit 72548e836b0c4abbb652e791dee9c91203a9a4c6:
x86/efi: Add EFI framebuffer ear
6 matches
Mail list logo
