Re: [GIT PULL] I/OAT updates for 2.6.22

2007-05-02 Thread Chris Leech
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 15:44 -0700, David Miller wrote: > > Chrstopher, I really really would like you to post these patches early > and often to [EMAIL PROTECTED] especially because you are > touching the TCP code. You're right, I should have sent this to netdev as well. I'm Sorry. As for

Re: [GIT PULL] I/OAT updates for 2.6.22

2007-05-02 Thread David Miller
Chrstopher, I really really would like you to post these patches early and often to [EMAIL PROTECTED] especially because you are touching the TCP code. You aren't doing this, for several rounds, and just submitting your stuff directly to Linus, Andrew, and lkml, and it's starting to annoy me

[GIT PULL] I/OAT updates for 2.6.22

2007-05-02 Thread Chris Leech
The following changes since commit dc87c3985e9b442c60994308a96f887579addc39: Linus Torvalds (1): libata: honour host controllers that want just one host are found in the git repository at: git://lost.foo-projects.org/~cleech/linux-2.6 Andrew Morton (1): I/OAT: warning fix

[GIT PULL] I/OAT updates for 2.6.22

2007-05-02 Thread Chris Leech
The following changes since commit dc87c3985e9b442c60994308a96f887579addc39: Linus Torvalds (1): libata: honour host controllers that want just one host are found in the git repository at: git://lost.foo-projects.org/~cleech/linux-2.6 Andrew Morton (1): I/OAT: warning fix

Re: [GIT PULL] I/OAT updates for 2.6.22

2007-05-02 Thread David Miller
Chrstopher, I really really would like you to post these patches early and often to [EMAIL PROTECTED] especially because you are touching the TCP code. You aren't doing this, for several rounds, and just submitting your stuff directly to Linus, Andrew, and lkml, and it's starting to annoy me

Re: [GIT PULL] I/OAT updates for 2.6.22

2007-05-02 Thread Chris Leech
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 15:44 -0700, David Miller wrote: Chrstopher, I really really would like you to post these patches early and often to [EMAIL PROTECTED] especially because you are touching the TCP code. You're right, I should have sent this to netdev as well. I'm Sorry. As for early