On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 05:07:46PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > [resend without the full diffstat as lkml and some email systems didn't
> > like to see emails with 12k lines...]
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > As discussed at the Maintainers Summit last week
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> [resend without the full diffstat as lkml and some email systems didn't
> like to see emails with 12k lines...]
>
> Hi,
>
> As discussed at the Maintainers Summit last week, here is a pull request
> that adds some SPDX license identifiers to three
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> The wreckage is with the *.lds.S ones which are used to generate .lds with
> some gcc preprocessor magic. And then ld falls flat on its nose with the //
> comment.
The cpp phase should just get rid of them.
But we actually explicitly us
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > Oh I wish that were the case :(
> >
> > Thomas and I fought with the vdso build logic[1], and some other
> > arch-specific stuff for a good day trying to track down all of the
> > individual .h fil
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> Oh I wish that were the case :(
>
> Thomas and I fought with the vdso build logic[1], and some other
> arch-specific stuff for a good day trying to track down all of the
> individual .h files that were getting pulled in by gcc to spit out a .S
>
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 10:52:23AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > For .h files, we had to use /* */
>
> That should only be true for the uapi files (because they may
> encounter old compilers), not for *.h files in general, I feel.
Oh I wis
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> For .h files, we had to use /* */
That should only be true for the uapi files (because they may
encounter old compilers), not for *.h files in general, I feel.
Linus
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 10:32:17AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> >
> > So to me, the "just put it as the first syntactically possible line,
> > and just always use the same comment format" is simply to avoid
> > unnecessary arguments/conf
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> So to me, the "just put it as the first syntactically possible line,
> and just always use the same comment format" is simply to avoid
> unnecessary arguments/conflicts about which of any number of ways you
> *could* do it.
Side note: I'm
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
>
> I am happy to follow the preferred style if any
> for my future patches. I just want to be sure.
So in general, the _hope_ is that we can just end up replacing
existing boilerplate comments with that single line SPDX comment
(using "//"
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 02:09:02AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
> 2017-11-03 0:16 GMT+09:00 Greg KH :
> > [resend without the full diffstat as lkml and some email systems didn't
> > like to see emails with 12k lines...]
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > As discussed at the Maintainers Summit last w
Hi.
2017-11-03 0:16 GMT+09:00 Greg KH :
> [resend without the full diffstat as lkml and some email systems didn't
> like to see emails with 12k lines...]
>
> Hi,
>
> As discussed at the Maintainers Summit last week, here is a pull request
> that adds some SPDX license identifiers to three differ
[resend without the full diffstat as lkml and some email systems didn't
like to see emails with 12k lines...]
Hi,
As discussed at the Maintainers Summit last week, here is a pull request
that adds some SPDX license identifiers to three different classes of
files:
- files with no license
13 matches
Mail list logo
