On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 08:19:57PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> wrote:
> >
> > Does the (currently being tested) patch below fix things up? If not,
> > please fill me in on the further error of my ways.
>
> Looks ok.
>
> That said, couldn't
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
>
> Does the (currently being tested) patch below fix things up? If not,
> please fill me in on the further error of my ways.
Looks ok.
That said, couldn't that last dummy gp_init_delay variable:
> +/* Delay in jiffies for grace-period
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:25:12PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> >
> >depends on RCU_TORTURE_TEST_SLOW_INIT
> >
> > would seem to be called for.
>
> Side note, you'll obviously also need to fix the actual bogus
> 'gp_init_delay'
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
>depends on RCU_TORTURE_TEST_SLOW_INIT
>
> would seem to be called for.
Side note, you'll obviously also need to fix the actual bogus
'gp_init_delay' use in kernel/rcu/tree.c.
That code is horrible.
Linus
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Please pull the latest core-rcu-for-linus git tree from:
This is very annoying:
...
torture tests for RCU (RCU_TORTURE_TEST) [N/m/y/?] n
How much to slow down RCU grace-period initialization
(RCU_TORTURE_TEST_SLOW_INIT_DELAY) [3]
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Paul E. McKenney
paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Does the (currently being tested) patch below fix things up? If not,
please fill me in on the further error of my ways.
Looks ok.
That said, couldn't that last dummy gp_init_delay variable:
+/* Delay in
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:25:12PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
depends on RCU_TORTURE_TEST_SLOW_INIT
would seem to be called for.
Side note, you'll obviously also need to fix the actual bogus
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
Please pull the latest core-rcu-for-linus git tree from:
This is very annoying:
...
torture tests for RCU (RCU_TORTURE_TEST) [N/m/y/?] n
How much to slow down RCU grace-period initialization
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
depends on RCU_TORTURE_TEST_SLOW_INIT
would seem to be called for.
Side note, you'll obviously also need to fix the actual bogus
'gp_init_delay' use in kernel/rcu/tree.c.
That code is horrible.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 08:19:57PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Paul E. McKenney
paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Does the (currently being tested) patch below fix things up? If not,
please fill me in on the further error of my ways.
Looks ok.
That
Linus,
Please pull the latest core-rcu-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git core-rcu-for-linus
# HEAD: 590ee7dbd569a012df705a5204fc5f1066f52b8c cpu: Provide
smpboot_thread_init() on !CONFIG_SMP kernels as well
The main changes in this cycle
Linus,
Please pull the latest core-rcu-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git core-rcu-for-linus
# HEAD: 590ee7dbd569a012df705a5204fc5f1066f52b8c cpu: Provide
smpboot_thread_init() on !CONFIG_SMP kernels as well
The main changes in this cycle
12 matches
Mail list logo
