Hi Arnaldo,
Here are my perf fixes based on top of your perf/urgent branch. I have
squashed the linux/hw_breakpoint.h disintegration patch into the main perf
patch as you can't have one without the other without getting errors.
I tried to apply Xiao Guangrong's builtin-kvm fixes for the
Hi Arnaldo,
Here are my perf fixes based on top of your perf/urgent branch. I have
squashed the linux/hw_breakpoint.h disintegration patch into the main perf
patch as you can't have one without the other without getting errors.
I tried to apply Xiao Guangrong's builtin-kvm fixes for the
On 11/14/2012 12:34 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:42:02AM -0500, Josh Boyer escreveu:
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:24 AM, David Howells wrote:
>>> Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c became x86-only with the following commit:
>>>
>>> commit
On 11/14/2012 12:34 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:42:02AM -0500, Josh Boyer escreveu:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:24 AM, David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c became x86-only with the following
Em Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:42:02AM -0500, Josh Boyer escreveu:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:24 AM, David Howells wrote:
> > Josh Boyer wrote:
> > tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c became x86-only with the following commit:
> >
> > commit bcf6edcd6fdb8965290f0b635a530fa3c6c212e1
> >
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:24 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> This patch seems to break building perf on ppc64. It fails with:
>>
>> + make -j16 -C tools/perf -s V=1 WERROR=0 HAVE_CPLUS_DEMANGLE=1 prefix=/usr
>> all
>>
>>
>>
>> builtin-kvm.c:25:21: fatal error: asm/svm.h: No
Josh Boyer wrote:
> This patch seems to break building perf on ppc64. It fails with:
>
> + make -j16 -C tools/perf -s V=1 WERROR=0 HAVE_CPLUS_DEMANGLE=1 prefix=/usr
> all
>
>
>
> builtin-kvm.c:25:21: fatal error: asm/svm.h: No such file or directory
tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c became
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 6:12 AM, David Howells wrote:
> David Howells wrote:
>
>> Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> > This patch seems to break building perf on ppc64. It fails with:
>>
>> Hmmm... Getting my hands on an ARM or ppc/ppc64 box running Fedora is a
>> problem, and as far as I know, this
David Howells wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > This patch seems to break building perf on ppc64. It fails with:
>
> Hmmm... Getting my hands on an ARM or ppc/ppc64 box running Fedora is a
> problem, and as far as I know, this needs to be built natively or maybe
> cross-compiled with a full
Josh Boyer wrote:
> This patch seems to break building perf on ppc64. It fails with:
Hmmm... Getting my hands on an ARM or ppc/ppc64 box running Fedora is a
problem, and as far as I know, this needs to be built natively or maybe
cross-compiled with a full environment (including graphics
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch seems to break building perf on ppc64. It fails with:
Hmmm... Getting my hands on an ARM or ppc/ppc64 box running Fedora is a
problem, and as far as I know, this needs to be built natively or maybe
cross-compiled with a full environment
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch seems to break building perf on ppc64. It fails with:
Hmmm... Getting my hands on an ARM or ppc/ppc64 box running Fedora is a
problem, and as far as I know, this needs to be built natively or maybe
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 6:12 AM, David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch seems to break building perf on ppc64. It fails with:
Hmmm... Getting my hands on an ARM or ppc/ppc64 box running Fedora is a
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch seems to break building perf on ppc64. It fails with:
+ make -j16 -C tools/perf -s V=1 WERROR=0 HAVE_CPLUS_DEMANGLE=1 prefix=/usr
all
snip
builtin-kvm.c:25:21: fatal error: asm/svm.h: No such file or directory
tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:24 AM, David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch seems to break building perf on ppc64. It fails with:
+ make -j16 -C tools/perf -s V=1 WERROR=0 HAVE_CPLUS_DEMANGLE=1 prefix=/usr
all
snip
builtin-kvm.c:25:21:
Em Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:42:02AM -0500, Josh Boyer escreveu:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:24 AM, David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c became x86-only with the following commit:
commit
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:51 AM, David Howells wrote:
>
> (6) Make perf work for x86 by adding -I flags and changing long #includes
> with "../../include" in them into short type things.
This patch seems to break building perf on ppc64. It fails with:
+ make -j16 -C tools/perf -s V=1
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:51 AM, David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
(6) Make perf work for x86 by adding -I flags and changing long #includes
with ../../include in them into short asm/foo.h type things.
This patch seems to break building perf on ppc64. It fails with:
+ make -j16
Hi Arnaldo,
Assuming my patches should be based on your perf/core branch, could you pull
from my git tree at tag perf-uapi-20121108 into your perf/core branch?
Note the tree also contains a uapi-perf-x86-20121108 tag that has the UAPI
disintegration branch for x86 merged on top for reference.
Hi Arnaldo,
Assuming my patches should be based on your perf/core branch, could you pull
from my git tree at tag perf-uapi-20121108 into your perf/core branch?
Note the tree also contains a uapi-perf-x86-20121108 tag that has the UAPI
disintegration branch for x86 merged on top for reference.
20 matches
Mail list logo
