The pull request you sent on Thu, 29 Oct 2020 14:07:26 +:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git
> tags/afs-fixes-20201029
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/598a597636f8618a0520fd3ccefedaed9e4709b0
Thank you!
--
Deet-
Hi Linus,
Could you pull these afs fixes, please? They include the following:
(1) Fix copy_file_range() to an afs file now returning EINVAL if the
splice_write file op isn't supplied.
(2) Fix a deref-before-check in afs_unuse_cell().
(3) Fix a use-after-free in afs_xattr_get_acl().
(
The pull request you sent on Tue, 16 Jun 2020 22:51:46 +0100:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git
> tags/afs-fixes-20200616
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/26c20ffcb5c86eb6a052e0d528396de5600c9710
Thank you!
--
Deet-
Hi Linus,
I've managed to get xfstests kind of working with afs. Here are a set of
patches that fix most of the bugs found.
There are a number of primary issues:
(1) Incorrect handling of mtime and non-handling of ctime. It might be
argued, that the latter isn't a bug since the AFS proto
The pull request you sent on Thu, 22 Aug 2019 14:10:39 +0100:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git
> tags/afs-fixes-20190822
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/e8c3fa9f4d3b9c56ee9436c310318a8165d695c1
Thank you!
--
Deet-
Hi Linus,
Here are three fixes for afs:
(1) Fix a cell record leak due to the default error not being cleared.
(2) Fix an oops in tracepoint due to a pointer that may contain an error.
(3) Fix the ACL storage op for YFS where the wrong op definition is being
used. By luck, this only ac
The pull request you sent on Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:18:40 +0100:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git
> tags/afs-fixes-20190814
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/e22a97a2a85d2a0bdfb134cbbc7ff856ae67edba
Thank you!
--
Deet-
Hi Linus,
Can you pull these afs fixes please?
(1) Fix the CB.ProbeUuid handler to generate its reply correctly.
(2) Fix a mix up in indices when parsing a Volume Location entry record.
(3) Fix a potential NULL-pointer deref when cleaning up a read request.
(4) Fix the expected data versio
Hi Linus,
Can you pull these afs fixes please?
(1) Fix the CB.ProbeUuid handler to generate its reply correctly.
(2) Fix a mix up in indices when parsing a Volume Location entry record.
(3) Fix a potential NULL-pointer deref when cleaning up a read request.
(4) Fix the expected data versio
The pull request you sent on Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:39:53 +0100:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git
> tags/afs-fixes-20190620
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/cd0f3aaebc5b17e0ccb1b9ef9ae43042d075d767
Thank you!
--
Deet-
Hi Linus,
Could you pull this please?
There are four patches:
(1) Fix the printing of the "vnode modified" warning to exclude checks on
files for which we don't have a callback promise from the server (and
so don't expect the server to tell us when it changes).
Without this, for
Oops... I forgot to include the pull request bit. Will resend.
David
Hi Linus,
Could you pull this please?
There are four patches:
(1) Fix the printing of the "vnode modified" warning to exclude checks on
files for which we don't have a callback promise from the server (and
so don't expect the server to tell us when it changes).
Without this, for
The pull request you sent on Tue, 07 May 2019 21:11:17 +0100:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git
> tags/afs-next-20190507
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/e5fef2a9732580c5bd30c0097f5e9091a3d58ce5
Thank you!
--
Deet-d
Hi Linus,
The following are a set of fix and development patches for AFS for 5.2. To
summarise:
(1) Fix the AFS file locking so that sqlite can run on an AFS mount and
also so that firefox and gnome can use a homedir that's mounted
through AFS.
This required emulation of fine-gr
The pull request you sent on Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:17:32 +0100:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git
> tags/afs-fixes-20190413
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/2a852fd1ac893d75879923025306f146b7e0747e
Thank you!
--
Deet-
Hi Linus,
Could you pull these afs fixes please? There are five:
(1) Stop using the deprecated get_seconds().
(2) Don't make tracepoint strings const as the section they go in isn't
read-only.
(3) Differentiate failure due to unmarshalling from other failure cases -
we shouldn't a
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The thing hasn't even seen a compiler, and when you *do* show the code
> to a compiler, said compiler correctly warns about
No, it doesn't - at least not gcc-8.3.1 on Fedora 29. What compiler are you
using?
> afs_do_silly_unlink() potentially returning an uninitialized
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 4:41 PM David Howells wrote:
>
> Here's a set of fixes and other bits for AFS to improve the life of desktop
> applications such as firefox.
I pulled, and immediately unpulled.
The thing hasn't even seen a compiler, and when you *do* show the code
to a compiler, said comp
Hi Linus,
Here's a set of fixes and other bits for AFS to improve the life of desktop
applications such as firefox. It makes the following improvements/fixes:
(1) Fix file locking to allow fine-grained locking, as required by firefox
and sqlite, with the caveat that you can't get a partial
Hi Linus,
Here's a set of fixes and other bits for AFS to improve the life of desktop
applications such as firefox. It makes the following improvements/fixes:
(1) Fix file locking to allow fine-grained locking, as required by firefox
and sqlite, with the caveat that you can't get a partial
Hi Linus,
Here's a set of patches that fix a number of bugs in the in-kernel AFS
client, including:
(1) Fix directory locking to not use individual page locks for directory
reading/scanning but rather to use a semaphore on the afs_vnode struct
as the directory contents must be read in
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> However, even when you do that, the page can be writable in other
> mappings. At least fork(), for example, only clears the dirty bit,
> doesn't mark it write-protected.
I assumed the rmap walk done by page_mkclean() would take care of that but I'm
not really clear on wha
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 12:35 PM, David Howells wrote:
>
> Doesn't clear_page_dirty_for_io() write-protect the PTE for the page to be
> written out, in which case ->page_mkwrite() will get called again before the
> page is redirtied?
No, it literally just sets the dirty bit (and does accounting).
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 10:35:43PM +, David Howells wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > So I see in the commit message why afs needs to do this, but it's
> > worth pointing out that it's
> >
> > (a) impossible to avoid the "inconsistent data" case for writable mmap'ed
> > pages
>
> Doesn
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So I see in the commit message why afs needs to do this, but it's
> worth pointing out that it's
>
> (a) impossible to avoid the "inconsistent data" case for writable mmap'ed
> pages
Doesn't clear_page_dirty_for_io() write-protect the PTE for the page to be
written out
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 4:22 AM, David Howells wrote:
>
> (2) Don't write to a page that's being written out, but wait for it to
> complete.
So I see in the commit message why afs needs to do this, but it's
worth pointing out that it's
(a) impossible to avoid the "inconsistent data" case
Hi Linus,
Can you pull these fixes for the AFS filesystem? They include:
(1) Make AFS file locking work again.
(2) Don't write to a page that's being written out, but wait for it to
complete.
(3) Do d_drop() and d_add() in the right places.
(4) Put keys on error paths.
(5) Remove s
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:29 AM, David Howells wrote:
>
> Could you pull these fixes to the AFS filesystem in the kernel please?
I took this, but honestly, most of the patches look like "merge
window" patches rather than -rc patches.
Exactly _one_ of the patches was marked for stable. The rest l
Hi Linus,
Could you pull these fixes to the AFS filesystem in the kernel please?
They fix a variety of bugs. These include some issues fixed for
consistency with other AFS implementations:
(*) Handle AFS mode bits better.
(*) Use the client mtime rather than the server mtime in the protocol.
30 matches
Mail list logo
