On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 10:38:41AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Also, now that the other architectures are gone, a lot of changes can
> be done more easily that will be incompatible with a pure revert, so
> the more time passes, the harder it will get to do that.
Yes, and an out-of-tree arch port
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2018-04-03 11:18:15, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> In reality, a resurrection may not be implemented as a pure revert, but as
>> the addition of a new architecture, implemented using modern features (DT,
>> CCF, ...).
>
> By insisting o
On Tue 2018-04-03 11:18:15, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 9:54 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 8:57 PM, Linus Torvalds
> > wrote:
> > Regarding a possible revert, that would indeed involve reverting
> > multiple patches for most architectures, plus parts o
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 9:54 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 8:57 PM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> Regarding a possible revert, that would indeed involve reverting
> multiple patches for most architectures, plus parts of at least these
> three:
>
> Documentation: arch-support: rem
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 12:17 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> The series is rather long and conflicts in trivial ways with lots
> of subsystem trees. You probably want to pull it either really
> early in the merge window or really late.
Ok, I've been pulling arch updates, so it went in now.
Side not
On Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:17:30 PDT (-0700), Arnd Bergmann wrote:
- openrisc, risc-v and nds32 are still in the process of finishing their
support or getting it added to mainline gcc in the first place.
They all have patched gcc-7.3 ports that work to some degree, but
complete upstream support
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 8:57 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 12:17 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> (dirstat only for brevity)
>
> Shortlog?
>
> I'd like to see that each architecture removal is independent of the
> others, so that if somebody wants to resurrect any particular
> a
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 12:17 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> (dirstat only for brevity)
Shortlog?
I'd like to see that each architecture removal is independent of the
others, so that if somebody wants to resurrect any particular
architecture, he/she can do so with a revert.
Can I just fetch things
Hi Linus,
The series is rather long and conflicts in trivial ways with lots
of subsystem trees. You probably want to pull it either really
early in the merge window or really late.
Arnd
The following changes since commit 661e50bc853209e41a5c14a290ca4decc43cbfd1:
Linux 4.16-rc4 (2018
9 matches
Mail list logo
