Re: [GIT PULL] at91: dt for 3.17 #1

2014-07-14 Thread Alexandre Belloni
Hi, On 12/07/2014 at 21:35:44 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote : > Looks good, you might want to ask him to write better tag descriptions though, > or fill them in a bit yourself when you do the merge. > I will definitely do better next time, I was thinking this would not appear anywhere. --

Re: [GIT PULL] at91: dt for 3.17 #1

2014-07-14 Thread Alexandre Belloni
Hi, On 12/07/2014 at 21:35:44 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote : Looks good, you might want to ask him to write better tag descriptions though, or fill them in a bit yourself when you do the merge. I will definitely do better next time, I was thinking this would not appear anywhere. --

Re: [GIT PULL] at91: dt for 3.17 #1

2014-07-12 Thread Olof Johansson
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 07:29:39PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Arnd, Olof, Kevin, > > This is a big pull-request concerning DT on AT91. The bulk of it is the move > of > the remaining SoCs to CCF. Some fixes and little additions are also included. > Alexandre's work were taken as a

Re: [GIT PULL] at91: dt for 3.17 #1

2014-07-12 Thread Olof Johansson
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 07:29:39PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: Arnd, Olof, Kevin, This is a big pull-request concerning DT on AT91. The bulk of it is the move of the remaining SoCs to CCF. Some fixes and little additions are also included. Alexandre's work were taken as a pull-request: as

[GIT PULL] at91: dt for 3.17 #1

2014-07-09 Thread Nicolas Ferre
Arnd, Olof, Kevin, This is a big pull-request concerning DT on AT91. The bulk of it is the move of the remaining SoCs to CCF. Some fixes and little additions are also included. Alexandre's work were taken as a pull-request: as it is my first one, please tell me if I did the inclusion correctly.

[GIT PULL] at91: dt for 3.17 #1

2014-07-09 Thread Nicolas Ferre
Arnd, Olof, Kevin, This is a big pull-request concerning DT on AT91. The bulk of it is the move of the remaining SoCs to CCF. Some fixes and little additions are also included. Alexandre's work were taken as a pull-request: as it is my first one, please tell me if I did the inclusion correctly.