Re: [GIT PULL] at91: dt for 4.6 #2

2016-03-03 Thread Nicolas Ferre
Le 02/03/2016 22:27, Arnd Bergmann a écrit : > On Wednesday 02 March 2016 22:07:50 Alexandre Belloni wrote: >> On 02/03/2016 at 21:50:59 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote : >>> I see that your gpg key has expired last week, you may want to do something >>> about that, I think you can just update the date

Re: [GIT PULL] at91: dt for 4.6 #2

2016-03-02 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 02 March 2016 22:07:50 Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 02/03/2016 at 21:50:59 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote : > > I see that your gpg key has expired last week, you may want to do something > > about that, I think you can just update the date rather than creating a > > new key. > > > > Yo

Re: [GIT PULL] at91: dt for 4.6 #2

2016-03-02 Thread Alexandre Belloni
Hi, On 02/03/2016 at 21:50:59 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote : > I see that your gpg key has expired last week, you may want to do something > about that, I think you can just update the date rather than creating a > new key. > You probably want to pull his key, it was updated today. -- Alexandre

Re: [GIT PULL] at91: dt for 4.6 #2

2016-03-02 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 02 March 2016 17:05:22 Nicolas Ferre wrote: > A second batch of DT updates for 4.6. This time it is based on 4.5-rc3 as one > of the patches fixes an node that was changed during 4.5-rc phase. As I saw > that your "next/dt" branches are based on 4.5-rc3, I thought it wouldn't be a > pr

[GIT PULL] at91: dt for 4.6 #2

2016-03-02 Thread Nicolas Ferre
Arnd, Olof, Kevin, A second batch of DT updates for 4.6. This time it is based on 4.5-rc3 as one of the patches fixes an node that was changed during 4.5-rc phase. As I saw that your "next/dt" branches are based on 4.5-rc3, I thought it wouldn't be a problem. Overall a pretty simple series with ma