Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.11 #1

2013-08-15 Thread Olof Johansson
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:33:33AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Arnd, Olof, Kevin, > > This is the first (late) fixes pull-reqest for AT91. I would understand if > you refuse it because we are already at -rc5 ;-) ... > > On the other hand, the line count is very low and all patches are pretty >

Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.11 #1

2013-08-15 Thread Olof Johansson
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:33:33AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: Arnd, Olof, Kevin, This is the first (late) fixes pull-reqest for AT91. I would understand if you refuse it because we are already at -rc5 ;-) ... On the other hand, the line count is very low and all patches are pretty

[GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.11 #1

2013-08-14 Thread Nicolas Ferre
Arnd, Olof, Kevin, This is the first (late) fixes pull-reqest for AT91. I would understand if you refuse it because we are already at -rc5 ;-) ... On the other hand, the line count is very low and all patches are pretty obvious. Thanks, best regards, The following changes since commit

[GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.11 #1

2013-08-14 Thread Nicolas Ferre
Arnd, Olof, Kevin, This is the first (late) fixes pull-reqest for AT91. I would understand if you refuse it because we are already at -rc5 ;-) ... On the other hand, the line count is very low and all patches are pretty obvious. Thanks, best regards, The following changes since commit