[GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.9-rc #2

2013-03-26 Thread Nicolas Ferre
Arnd, Olof, Another "fixes" pull-request for AT91 on top of material that you have already taken. Fixes are manly typos but the bad node declaration and some misspelling can cause confusion. The following changes since commit 0ed66befaae893e82c9f016238282d73ef9fd6c7: ARM: at91: fix infinite lo

Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.9-rc #2

2013-03-26 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 26 March 2013, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Another "fixes" pull-request for AT91 on top of material that you have already > taken. Fixes are manly typos but the bad node declaration and some misspelling > can cause confusion. Hi Nicolas, I'd prefer to take only fixes for serious bugs into 3

Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.9-rc #2

2013-03-26 Thread Nicolas Ferre
On 03/26/2013 11:22 AM, Arnd Bergmann : > On Tuesday 26 March 2013, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> Another "fixes" pull-request for AT91 on top of material that you have >> already >> taken. Fixes are manly typos but the bad node declaration and some >> misspelling >> can cause confusion. > > Hi Nicola

Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.9-rc #2

2013-03-26 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 26 March 2013, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Indeed, at first sight its looks like a nice solution. But I wonder if > we add several nodes in this kind of .dtsi files, we may end up with > mess between APB peripherals and board specific ones like leds, NAND, etc. > Moreover, the plain and full

Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.9-rc #2

2013-03-27 Thread Nicolas Ferre
On 03/26/2013 12:05 PM, Arnd Bergmann : > On Tuesday 26 March 2013, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> Indeed, at first sight its looks like a nice solution. But I wonder if >> we add several nodes in this kind of .dtsi files, we may end up with >> mess between APB peripherals and board specific ones like led