On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 01:08:24PM +0800, hejianet wrote:
> Hi Frederic
>
> Do we need to support CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE=n on ppc64le?
>
> If yes, I got a compiling error after applying your patch set:
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c:712:2: error: implicit declaration of function
>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 01:08:24PM +0800, hejianet wrote:
> Hi Frederic
>
> Do we need to support CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE=n on ppc64le?
>
> If yes, I got a compiling error after applying your patch set:
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c:712:2: error: implicit declaration of function
>
Hi Frederic
Do we need to support CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE=n on ppc64le?
If yes, I got a compiling error after applying your patch set:
arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c:712:2: error: implicit declaration of function
‘cputime_to_nsecs’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
return
Hi Frederic
Do we need to support CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE=n on ppc64le?
If yes, I got a compiling error after applying your patch set:
arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c:712:2: error: implicit declaration of function
‘cputime_to_nsecs’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
return
* Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:08:18AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:46:43AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > Ingo,
> > > >
> > > > Please pull
* Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:08:18AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:46:43AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > Ingo,
> > > >
> > > > Please pull the cputime/nsecs-for-tip branch that can
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:08:18AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:46:43AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > Ingo,
> > >
> > > Please pull the cputime/nsecs-for-tip branch that can be found at:
> > >
> > >
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:08:18AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:46:43AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > Ingo,
> > >
> > > Please pull the cputime/nsecs-for-tip branch that can be found at:
> > >
> > >
* Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:46:43AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Ingo,
> >
> > Please pull the cputime/nsecs-for-tip branch that can be found at:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git
> >
* Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:46:43AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Ingo,
> >
> > Please pull the cputime/nsecs-for-tip branch that can be found at:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git
> >
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:46:43AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Ingo,
>
> Please pull the cputime/nsecs-for-tip branch that can be found at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git
> cputime/nsecs-for-tip
Ping! :-)
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:46:43AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Ingo,
>
> Please pull the cputime/nsecs-for-tip branch that can be found at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git
> cputime/nsecs-for-tip
Ping! :-)
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 03:56:49PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 03:32:24PM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:46:43AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > Now lets admit one drawback: s390 and powerpc with
> > >
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 03:56:49PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 03:32:24PM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:46:43AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > Now lets admit one drawback: s390 and powerpc with
> > >
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 03:32:24PM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:46:43AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Now lets admit one drawback: s390 and powerpc with
> > CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE have new cputime_t to nsecs conversion
> > on cputime accounting
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 03:32:24PM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:46:43AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Now lets admit one drawback: s390 and powerpc with
> > CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE have new cputime_t to nsecs conversion
> > on cputime accounting
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:46:43AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Now lets admit one drawback: s390 and powerpc with
> CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE have new cputime_t to nsecs conversion
> on cputime accounting path. But this should be leveraged by the recent
> changes which delay the
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:46:43AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Now lets admit one drawback: s390 and powerpc with
> CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE have new cputime_t to nsecs conversion
> on cputime accounting path. But this should be leveraged by the recent
> changes which delay the
Ingo,
Please pull the cputime/nsecs-for-tip branch that can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git
cputime/nsecs-for-tip
HEAD: 14d889bef71ff808c450f82bcd257b10f05bb061
The patches are the same than on my previous post:
Ingo,
Please pull the cputime/nsecs-for-tip branch that can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git
cputime/nsecs-for-tip
HEAD: 14d889bef71ff808c450f82bcd257b10f05bb061
The patches are the same than on my previous post:
20 matches
Mail list logo