On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:04:44PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Please do not merge this patch. I will reuse the destructor field for
> the kmem_cache_ops in the slab defrag patchset. If you apply this patch
> then I need to readd the parameter later.
The vast majority of slabs won't have any
Please do not merge this patch. I will reuse the destructor field for
the kmem_cache_ops in the slab defrag patchset. If you apply this patch
then I need to readd the parameter later.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTEC
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 04:28:52PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:28:46AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > Slab destructors were no longer supported after Christoph's
> > c59def9f222d44bb7e2f0a559f2906191a0862d7 change. They've been
> > BUGs for both slab and slub, and slob nev
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:28:46AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> Slab destructors were no longer supported after Christoph's
> c59def9f222d44bb7e2f0a559f2906191a0862d7 change. They've been
> BUGs for both slab and slub, and slob never supported them
> either.
SLOB of course did support destructors, o
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Paul Mundt wrote:
>
> Perhaps this is something that should go in later, as it does
> cause a bit of churn across the tree. However, there shouldn't be
> anything here that causes trouble for git merges, as it's all pretty
> straightforward removal. I've placed it in a git t
Slab destructors were no longer supported after Christoph's
c59def9f222d44bb7e2f0a559f2906191a0862d7 change. They've been
BUGs for both slab and slub, and slob never supported them
either.
This rips out support for the dtor pointer from kmem_cache_create()
completely and fixes up every single call
6 matches
Mail list logo
