On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:02:16 -0700
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> As an explanation, the above kind of sucks. "SDT"? I had to look it
> up. I added a note to the commit message, but please, don't use random
> acronyms in kernel explanations unless they are industry-standard and
> comprehensible to
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:02:16 -0700
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> As an explanation, the above kind of sucks. "SDT"? I had to look it
> up. I added a note to the commit message, but please, don't use random
> acronyms in kernel explanations unless they are industry-standard and
> comprehensible to
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 6:37 AM Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> The biggest change here is the updates to kprobes
Pulled.
However, a little note:
> - Added support for SDT in uprobes
As an explanation, the above kind of sucks. "SDT"? I had to look it
up. I added a note to the commit message, but
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 6:37 AM Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> The biggest change here is the updates to kprobes
Pulled.
However, a little note:
> - Added support for SDT in uprobes
As an explanation, the above kind of sucks. "SDT"? I had to look it
up. I added a note to the commit message, but
Linus,
The biggest change here is the updates to kprobes
Back in January I posted patches to create function based events. These were
the events that you suggested I make to allow developers to easily create
events in code where no trace event exists. After posting those changes for
review, it
Linus,
The biggest change here is the updates to kprobes
Back in January I posted patches to create function based events. These were
the events that you suggested I make to allow developers to easily create
events in code where no trace event exists. After posting those changes for
review, it
6 matches
Mail list logo