Re: [GIT PULL] x86: remove Intel MPX

2018-12-05 Thread Dave Hansen
On 12/5/18 10:42 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 08:44:43AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: >> Hi x86 maintainers, >> >> Please pull from: >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/daveh/x86-mpx.git >> mpx-remove >> >> There is only one commit, removing the

Re: [GIT PULL] x86: remove Intel MPX

2018-12-05 Thread Dave Hansen
On 12/5/18 10:42 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 08:44:43AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: >> Hi x86 maintainers, >> >> Please pull from: >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/daveh/x86-mpx.git >> mpx-remove >> >> There is only one commit, removing the

Re: [GIT PULL] x86: remove Intel MPX

2018-12-05 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 08:44:43AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > Hi x86 maintainers, > > Please pull from: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/daveh/x86-mpx.git > mpx-remove > > There is only one commit, removing the Intel MPX implementation from the > tree. The benefits of

Re: [GIT PULL] x86: remove Intel MPX

2018-12-05 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 08:44:43AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > Hi x86 maintainers, > > Please pull from: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/daveh/x86-mpx.git > mpx-remove > > There is only one commit, removing the Intel MPX implementation from the > tree. The benefits of

[GIT PULL] x86: remove Intel MPX

2018-12-05 Thread Dave Hansen
Hi x86 maintainers, Please pull from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/daveh/x86-mpx.git mpx-remove There is only one commit, removing the Intel MPX implementation from the tree. The benefits of keeping the feature in the tree are not worth the ongoing maintenance cost.

[GIT PULL] x86: remove Intel MPX

2018-12-05 Thread Dave Hansen
Hi x86 maintainers, Please pull from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/daveh/x86-mpx.git mpx-remove There is only one commit, removing the Intel MPX implementation from the tree. The benefits of keeping the feature in the tree are not worth the ongoing maintenance cost.