On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 9:48 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> I do use it, I take the commits from there and then queue them up as
> individual patches for the stable releases.
>
> And if it wasn't there, the conflict resolution would have to be on my
> side, making them "not the same commits in
* Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > This is not a complaint so much as a "is it worth it?" question..
> >
> > So far, I think this is the first conflict it's generated in a long
> > time, so previously it was worth it from my point of view. As long as
> > it doesn't cause more work for the TIP maintain
* Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:17:25PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > >This tree generates two relatively simple conflicts with your tree:
> >
> > So what annoys me about these conflicts is that I'm n
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:17:25PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >This tree generates two relatively simple conflicts with your tree:
>
> So what annoys me about these conflicts is that I'm not convinced that
> the stable tree actuall
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>This tree generates two relatively simple conflicts with your tree:
So what annoys me about these conflicts is that I'm not convinced that
the stable tree actually *uses* your fancy x86/pti branch?
I think stable ends up working like a p
Linus,
Please consider pulling the latest x86-pti-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86-pti-for-linus
# HEAD: 48753793350974b7afe9598fd1dc46b2f1f47c2d x86/entry/64: Fix CR3
restore in paranoid_exit()
Here's the latest set of Spectre and PT
6 matches
Mail list logo
