Re: [GIT PULL 00/49] perf/core improvements and fixes

2014-01-12 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > Hi Ingo, > > This one has the 34 out of 35 patches from the previous pull req, > removing > the 'perf stat' one about not printing stats for workloads we failed to > start, that > requires more thinking and

Re: [GIT PULL 00/49] perf/core improvements and fixes

2014-01-12 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo a...@infradead.org wrote: From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo a...@ghostprotocols.net Hi Ingo, This one has the 34 out of 35 patches from the previous pull req, removing the 'perf stat' one about not printing stats for workloads we failed to start, that

[GIT PULL 00/49] perf/core improvements and fixes

2013-12-27 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Hi Ingo, This one has the 34 out of 35 patches from the previous pull req, removing the 'perf stat' one about not printing stats for workloads we failed to start, that requires more thinking and introduced a regression. I'm suppressing those

[GIT PULL 00/49] perf/core improvements and fixes

2013-12-27 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo a...@ghostprotocols.net Hi Ingo, This one has the 34 out of 35 patches from the previous pull req, removing the 'perf stat' one about not printing stats for workloads we failed to start, that requires more thinking and introduced a regression.