Re: [GIT PULL 1/2] Btrfs fixes

2012-08-21 Thread Chris Mason
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 07:55:59PM -0600, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Chris Samuel wrote: > > > > This pull request with a whole heap of btrfs fixes (46 commits) appears > > not to have been merged yet, does anyone know if it was rejected or just > > missed ? > >

Re: [GIT PULL 1/2] Btrfs fixes

2012-08-21 Thread Chris Mason
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 07:55:59PM -0600, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Chris Samuel ch...@csamuel.org wrote: This pull request with a whole heap of btrfs fixes (46 commits) appears not to have been merged yet, does anyone know if it was rejected or just missed ?

Re: [GIT PULL 1/2] Btrfs fixes

2012-08-20 Thread Chris Samuel
On 21/08/12 11:55, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Read my -rc2 release notes. Ahh, thanks (I'm not on LKML so didn't see those). > TL;DR: I rejected big pull requests that didn't convince me. Make a > damn good case for it, or send minimal fixes instead. Can't argue with that! > I'm tried of these

Re: [GIT PULL 1/2] Btrfs fixes

2012-08-20 Thread Chris Samuel
On 10/08/12 01:50, Chris Mason wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This first pull is the bulk of our changes for the next rc. It is > against the 3.5 kernel so people testing the new features have a stable > point to work against. This was tested against Linus' current tree as > well. [...] This pull

Re: [GIT PULL 1/2] Btrfs fixes

2012-08-20 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Chris Samuel wrote: > > This pull request with a whole heap of btrfs fixes (46 commits) appears > not to have been merged yet, does anyone know if it was rejected or just > missed ? Read my -rc2 release notes. TL;DR: I rejected big pull requests that didn't

Re: [GIT PULL 1/2] Btrfs fixes

2012-08-20 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Chris Samuel ch...@csamuel.org wrote: This pull request with a whole heap of btrfs fixes (46 commits) appears not to have been merged yet, does anyone know if it was rejected or just missed ? Read my -rc2 release notes. TL;DR: I rejected big pull requests

Re: [GIT PULL 1/2] Btrfs fixes

2012-08-20 Thread Chris Samuel
On 10/08/12 01:50, Chris Mason wrote: Hi everyone, This first pull is the bulk of our changes for the next rc. It is against the 3.5 kernel so people testing the new features have a stable point to work against. This was tested against Linus' current tree as well. [...] This pull

Re: [GIT PULL 1/2] Btrfs fixes

2012-08-20 Thread Chris Samuel
On 21/08/12 11:55, Linus Torvalds wrote: Read my -rc2 release notes. Ahh, thanks (I'm not on LKML so didn't see those). TL;DR: I rejected big pull requests that didn't convince me. Make a damn good case for it, or send minimal fixes instead. Can't argue with that! I'm tried of these oops,

[GIT PULL 1/2] Btrfs fixes

2012-08-09 Thread Chris Mason
Hi everyone, This first pull is the bulk of our changes for the next rc. It is against the 3.5 kernel so people testing the new features have a stable point to work against. This was tested against Linus' current tree as well. The second pull is just one fix against 3.6-rc1 (in another email).

[GIT PULL 1/2] Btrfs fixes

2012-08-09 Thread Chris Mason
Hi everyone, This first pull is the bulk of our changes for the next rc. It is against the 3.5 kernel so people testing the new features have a stable point to work against. This was tested against Linus' current tree as well. The second pull is just one fix against 3.6-rc1 (in another email).