On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 07:55:59PM -0600, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Chris Samuel wrote:
> >
> > This pull request with a whole heap of btrfs fixes (46 commits) appears
> > not to have been merged yet, does anyone know if it was rejected or just
> > missed ?
>
>
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 07:55:59PM -0600, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Chris Samuel ch...@csamuel.org wrote:
This pull request with a whole heap of btrfs fixes (46 commits) appears
not to have been merged yet, does anyone know if it was rejected or just
missed ?
On 21/08/12 11:55, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Read my -rc2 release notes.
Ahh, thanks (I'm not on LKML so didn't see those).
> TL;DR: I rejected big pull requests that didn't convince me. Make a
> damn good case for it, or send minimal fixes instead.
Can't argue with that!
> I'm tried of these
On 10/08/12 01:50, Chris Mason wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This first pull is the bulk of our changes for the next rc. It is
> against the 3.5 kernel so people testing the new features have a stable
> point to work against. This was tested against Linus' current tree as
> well.
[...]
This pull
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Chris Samuel wrote:
>
> This pull request with a whole heap of btrfs fixes (46 commits) appears
> not to have been merged yet, does anyone know if it was rejected or just
> missed ?
Read my -rc2 release notes.
TL;DR: I rejected big pull requests that didn't
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Chris Samuel ch...@csamuel.org wrote:
This pull request with a whole heap of btrfs fixes (46 commits) appears
not to have been merged yet, does anyone know if it was rejected or just
missed ?
Read my -rc2 release notes.
TL;DR: I rejected big pull requests
On 10/08/12 01:50, Chris Mason wrote:
Hi everyone,
This first pull is the bulk of our changes for the next rc. It is
against the 3.5 kernel so people testing the new features have a stable
point to work against. This was tested against Linus' current tree as
well.
[...]
This pull
On 21/08/12 11:55, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Read my -rc2 release notes.
Ahh, thanks (I'm not on LKML so didn't see those).
TL;DR: I rejected big pull requests that didn't convince me. Make a
damn good case for it, or send minimal fixes instead.
Can't argue with that!
I'm tried of these oops,
Hi everyone,
This first pull is the bulk of our changes for the next rc. It is
against the 3.5 kernel so people testing the new features have a stable
point to work against. This was tested against Linus' current tree as
well.
The second pull is just one fix against 3.6-rc1 (in another email).
Hi everyone,
This first pull is the bulk of our changes for the next rc. It is
against the 3.5 kernel so people testing the new features have a stable
point to work against. This was tested against Linus' current tree as
well.
The second pull is just one fix against 3.6-rc1 (in another email).
10 matches
Mail list logo