On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 2:49 AM David Howells wrote:
>
> Actually, waiting for all outstanding fixes to get merged and then rebasing
> might not be the right thing here. The problem is that there are fixes in
> both trees: afs fixes go directly into yours whereas rxrpc fixes go via
> networking a
On 9/19/2019 9:15 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Why is it organised this way? I mean, yes, technically, rxrpc is a
> generic layer-6 protocol that any blah blah blah, but in practice no
> other user has come up in the last 37 years, so why bother pretending
> one is going to? Just git mv net/rxrpc
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Why is it organised this way? I mean, yes, technically, rxrpc is a
> generic layer-6 protocol that any blah blah blah, but in practice no
> other user has come up in the last 37 years, so why bother pretending
> one is going to? Just git mv net/rxrpc fs/afs/ and merge ev
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 3:55 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:49:22AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > David Howells wrote:
> >
> > > > However, I was close to unpulling it again. It has a merge commit with
> > > > this merge message:
> > > >
> > > > Merge remote-trackin
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 10:49:22AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> David Howells wrote:
>
> > > However, I was close to unpulling it again. It has a merge commit with
> > > this merge message:
> > >
> > > Merge remote-tracking branch 'net/master' into afs-next
> > >
> > > and that simply is n
David Howells wrote:
> > However, I was close to unpulling it again. It has a merge commit with
> > this merge message:
> >
> > Merge remote-tracking branch 'net/master' into afs-next
> >
> > and that simply is not acceptable.
>
> Apologies - I meant to rebase that away. There was a bug f
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> However, I was close to unpulling it again. It has a merge commit with
> this merge message:
>
> Merge remote-tracking branch 'net/master' into afs-next
>
> and that simply is not acceptable.
Apologies - I meant to rebase that away. There was a bug fix to rxrpc in
The pull request you sent on Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:09:27 +0100:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git
> tags/afs-next-20190915
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/0bb73e42f027db64054fff4c3b3203c1626b9dc1
Thank you!
--
Deet-d
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 5:22 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> Commit messages need to explain the commit. The same is even more true
> of merges!
Side note: that wasn't actually the only problem with that merge.
The other problem was that neither of the merge bases made any sense
what-so-ever. Neith
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 4:09 AM David Howells wrote:
>
> Here's a set of patches for AFS. The first three are trivial, deleting
> unused symbols and rolling out a wrapper function.
Pulled.
However, I was close to unpulling it again. It has a merge commit with
this merge message:
Merge remo
Hi Linus,
Here's a set of patches for AFS. The first three are trivial, deleting
unused symbols and rolling out a wrapper function.
The fourth and fifth patches make use of the previously added RCU-safe
request_key facility to allow afs_permission() and afs_d_revalidate() to
attempt to operate w
11 matches
Mail list logo
