Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-16 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 08:26:29AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:17:07AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > * Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > * Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-16 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 02:24:55PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote: > On 07/16/2014 02:15 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote: > > > > On 07/16/2014 01:24 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > And of course if you don't actually specify a nohz_full= mask, then > tick_nohz_full_mask can be NULL at RCU

Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-16 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 02:15:50PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote: > > On 07/16/2014 01:24 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > >>> And of course if you don't actually specify a nohz_full= mask, then > >>> tick_nohz_full_mask can be NULL at RCU initialization time, and if it > >>> is also true that

Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-16 Thread Pranith Kumar
On 07/16/2014 02:15 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote: > > On 07/16/2014 01:24 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: And of course if you don't actually specify a nohz_full= mask, then tick_nohz_full_mask can be NULL at RCU initialization time, and if it is also true that CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL=n, this

Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-16 Thread Pranith Kumar
On 07/16/2014 01:24 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >>> And of course if you don't actually specify a nohz_full= mask, then >>> tick_nohz_full_mask can be NULL at RCU initialization time, and if it >>> is also true that CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL=n, this condition can persist >>> forever. >>> >> Hi Paul,

Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-16 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:57:27AM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote: > On 07/16/2014 11:26 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:17:07AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >>> > >>> * Ingo Molnar wrote: > >>> > >

Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-16 Thread Pranith Kumar
On 07/16/2014 11:26 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:17:07AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> >>> * Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> * Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Hello, Ingo, > > The changes

Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-16 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:17:07AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > > > * Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, Ingo, > > > > > > > > The changes in this series include: > > > > > >

Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-16 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > * Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > Hello, Ingo, > > > > > > The changes in this series include: > > > > > > 1.Update RCU documentation. These were posted to LKML at > > >

Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-16 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Hello, Ingo, > > The changes in this series include: > > 1.Update RCU documentation. These were posted to LKML at > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/7/650. > > 2.Miscellaneous fixes. These were posted to LKML at >

Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-16 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Hello, Ingo, The changes in this series include: 1.Update RCU documentation. These were posted to LKML at https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/7/650. 2.Miscellaneous fixes. These were posted to LKML at

Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-16 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote: * Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Hello, Ingo, The changes in this series include: 1.Update RCU documentation. These were posted to LKML at

Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-16 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:17:07AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote: * Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Hello, Ingo, The changes in this series

Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-16 Thread Pranith Kumar
On 07/16/2014 11:26 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:17:07AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote: * Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Hello, Ingo, The

Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-16 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:57:27AM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote: On 07/16/2014 11:26 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:17:07AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote: * Paul

Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-16 Thread Pranith Kumar
On 07/16/2014 01:24 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: And of course if you don't actually specify a nohz_full= mask, then tick_nohz_full_mask can be NULL at RCU initialization time, and if it is also true that CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL=n, this condition can persist forever. Hi Paul, The other

Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-16 Thread Pranith Kumar
On 07/16/2014 02:15 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote: On 07/16/2014 01:24 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: And of course if you don't actually specify a nohz_full= mask, then tick_nohz_full_mask can be NULL at RCU initialization time, and if it is also true that CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL=n, this condition can

Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-16 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 02:15:50PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote: On 07/16/2014 01:24 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: And of course if you don't actually specify a nohz_full= mask, then tick_nohz_full_mask can be NULL at RCU initialization time, and if it is also true that

Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-16 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 02:24:55PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote: On 07/16/2014 02:15 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote: On 07/16/2014 01:24 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: And of course if you don't actually specify a nohz_full= mask, then tick_nohz_full_mask can be NULL at RCU initialization time, and

Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-16 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 08:26:29AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:17:07AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote: * Paul E. McKenney

[GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-13 Thread Paul E. McKenney
Hello, Ingo, The changes in this series include: 1. Update RCU documentation. These were posted to LKML at https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/7/650. 2. Miscellaneous fixes. These were posted to LKML at https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/7/678. 3. Maintainership changes.

[GIT PULL rcu/next] RCU commits for 3.17

2014-07-13 Thread Paul E. McKenney
Hello, Ingo, The changes in this series include: 1. Update RCU documentation. These were posted to LKML at https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/7/650. 2. Miscellaneous fixes. These were posted to LKML at https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/7/678. 3. Maintainership changes.