On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 08:26:29AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:17:07AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > * Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > >
> >
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 02:24:55PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> On 07/16/2014 02:15 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> >
> > On 07/16/2014 01:24 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> And of course if you don't actually specify a nohz_full= mask, then
> tick_nohz_full_mask can be NULL at RCU
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 02:15:50PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>
> On 07/16/2014 01:24 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>> And of course if you don't actually specify a nohz_full= mask, then
> >>> tick_nohz_full_mask can be NULL at RCU initialization time, and if it
> >>> is also true that
On 07/16/2014 02:15 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>
> On 07/16/2014 01:24 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
And of course if you don't actually specify a nohz_full= mask, then
tick_nohz_full_mask can be NULL at RCU initialization time, and if it
is also true that CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL=n, this
On 07/16/2014 01:24 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> And of course if you don't actually specify a nohz_full= mask, then
>>> tick_nohz_full_mask can be NULL at RCU initialization time, and if it
>>> is also true that CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL=n, this condition can persist
>>> forever.
>>>
>> Hi Paul,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:57:27AM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> On 07/16/2014 11:26 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:17:07AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>>
> >>> * Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>>
>
>
On 07/16/2014 11:26 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:17:07AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> * Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
* Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hello, Ingo,
>
> The changes
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:17:07AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > * Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello, Ingo,
> > > >
> > > > The changes in this series include:
> > > >
> >
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> >
> > * Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > > Hello, Ingo,
> > >
> > > The changes in this series include:
> > >
> > > 1.Update RCU documentation. These were posted to LKML at
> > >
* Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hello, Ingo,
>
> The changes in this series include:
>
> 1.Update RCU documentation. These were posted to LKML at
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/7/650.
>
> 2.Miscellaneous fixes. These were posted to LKML at
>
* Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hello, Ingo,
The changes in this series include:
1.Update RCU documentation. These were posted to LKML at
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/7/650.
2.Miscellaneous fixes. These were posted to LKML at
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hello, Ingo,
The changes in this series include:
1.Update RCU documentation. These were posted to LKML at
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:17:07AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hello, Ingo,
The changes in this series
On 07/16/2014 11:26 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:17:07AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hello, Ingo,
The
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:57:27AM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
On 07/16/2014 11:26 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:17:07AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Paul
On 07/16/2014 01:24 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
And of course if you don't actually specify a nohz_full= mask, then
tick_nohz_full_mask can be NULL at RCU initialization time, and if it
is also true that CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL=n, this condition can persist
forever.
Hi Paul,
The other
On 07/16/2014 02:15 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
On 07/16/2014 01:24 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
And of course if you don't actually specify a nohz_full= mask, then
tick_nohz_full_mask can be NULL at RCU initialization time, and if it
is also true that CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL=n, this condition can
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 02:15:50PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
On 07/16/2014 01:24 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
And of course if you don't actually specify a nohz_full= mask, then
tick_nohz_full_mask can be NULL at RCU initialization time, and if it
is also true that
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 02:24:55PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
On 07/16/2014 02:15 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
On 07/16/2014 01:24 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
And of course if you don't actually specify a nohz_full= mask, then
tick_nohz_full_mask can be NULL at RCU initialization time, and
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 08:26:29AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:17:07AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:13:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Paul E. McKenney
Hello, Ingo,
The changes in this series include:
1. Update RCU documentation. These were posted to LKML at
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/7/650.
2. Miscellaneous fixes. These were posted to LKML at
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/7/678.
3. Maintainership changes.
Hello, Ingo,
The changes in this series include:
1. Update RCU documentation. These were posted to LKML at
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/7/650.
2. Miscellaneous fixes. These were posted to LKML at
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/7/678.
3. Maintainership changes.
22 matches
Mail list logo