On Sun, 27 Oct, at 09:34:09PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 08:22:15PM +, Matt Fleming wrote:
> > I've certainly no problem with moving it under drivers/firmware/efi/,
> > but please don't create a new subdirectory in drivers/ just for this.
>
> Yeah, no - we have an subdir
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 08:22:15PM +, Matt Fleming wrote:
> I've certainly no problem with moving it under drivers/firmware/efi/,
> but please don't create a new subdirectory in drivers/ just for this.
Yeah, no - we have an subdir for this - drivers/firmware/efi/ so no need
for the drivers/u?e
On Sun, 27 Oct, at 12:01:48PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 08:00:35AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Tony Luck wrote:
> >
> > > > Hm, I'm not sure we should move something named after a hardware
> > > > feature into lib/. It's not really generic C library functionality
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 08:00:35AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Tony Luck wrote:
>
> > > Hm, I'm not sure we should move something named after a hardware
> > > feature into lib/. It's not really generic C library functionality,
> >
> >
> > Not a hardware feature. CPER stands for Common Plat
* Tony Luck wrote:
> > Hm, I'm not sure we should move something named after a hardware
> > feature into lib/. It's not really generic C library functionality,
>
>
> Not a hardware feature. CPER stands for Common Platform Error Record
> from the UEFI standard. [...]
By all means UEFI can be
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 02:34:52PM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> As Chen Gong points out, drivers/acpi isn't the right place ... so if not
> lib/ ... then where?
A to be created drivers/efi? There should be a lot more shared EFI code
coming sooner or later, shouldn't it?
--
To unsubscribe from this
> Hm, I'm not sure we should move something named after a hardware
> feature into lib/. It's not really generic C library functionality,
>
Not a hardware feature. CPER stands for Common Platform Error Record from the
UEFI standard. So applicable to three? architectures.
As Chen Gong points ou
* Tony Luck wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > Replacement for yesterday's pull request - fixes a build bug when
> > CONFIG_SMP=n
> > found by Fengguang's zero-day auto-build robot army. If you pulled (and
> > pushed)
> > that one before finding this in your mai
* Luck, Tony wrote:
> Replacement for yesterday's pull request - fixes a build bug when CONFIG_SMP=n
> found by Fengguang's zero-day auto-build robot army. If you pulled (and
> pushed)
> that one before finding this in your mailbox - then I can send the one-line
> patch to be applied on top of
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Luck, Tony wrote:
> Replacement for yesterday's pull request - fixes a build bug when CONFIG_SMP=n
> found by Fengguang's zero-day auto-build robot army. If you pulled (and
> pushed)
> that one before finding this in your mailbox - then I can send the one-line
>
Replacement for yesterday's pull request - fixes a build bug when CONFIG_SMP=n
found by Fengguang's zero-day auto-build robot army. If you pulled (and pushed)
that one before finding this in your mailbox - then I can send the one-line
patch to be applied on top of yesterday's version.
-Tony
The
11 matches
Mail list logo
