On Tue, Dec 13, 2016, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2016, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> It looks pretty self-contained (good), but it also looks majorly
>> strange. I will have to think about this. What are the main/expected
>> users?
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2016, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Ugh, this is some funky stuff. And it's entirely x86-specific, with a
>> rather odd special filesystem interface.
>
> Yes. The inter
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > This update provides the support for Intel Cache Allocation Technology, a
> > cache partitioning mechanism.
Sorry for being terse in the pull request.
> Ugh, this is some funky stuff. An
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 08:26:50PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > This update provides the support for Intel Cache Allocation Technology, a
> > cache partitioning mechanism.
>
> Ugh, this is some funky stuff. And it's entirely x86-sp
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> This update provides the support for Intel Cache Allocation Technology, a
> cache partitioning mechanism.
Ugh, this is some funky stuff. And it's entirely x86-specific, with a
rather odd special filesystem interface.
It looks pretty sel
Linus,
please pull the latest x86-cache-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86-cache-for-linus
This update provides the support for Intel Cache Allocation Technology, a
cache partitioning mechanism.
Thanks,
tglx
-->
Bo
6 matches
Mail list logo