On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:05:30PM -0400, J?r?me Glisse wrote:
> This does not use existing page table walker because we want to share
> same code for our page fault handler.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Use spinlock instead of rcu synchronized list traversal
>
Didn't look too closely here
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:05:30PM -0400, J?r?me Glisse wrote:
> This does not use existing page table walker because we want to share
> same code for our page fault handler.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Use spinlock instead of rcu synchronized list traversal
>
Didn't look too closely here
This does not use existing page table walker because we want to share
same code for our page fault handler.
Changes since v1:
- Use spinlock instead of rcu synchronized list traversal
Signed-off-by: Jérôme Glisse
Signed-off-by: Evgeny Baskakov
This does not use existing page table walker because we want to share
same code for our page fault handler.
Changes since v1:
- Use spinlock instead of rcu synchronized list traversal
Signed-off-by: Jérôme Glisse
Signed-off-by: Evgeny Baskakov
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard
Signed-off-by: Mark
4 matches
Mail list logo