On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 07:27 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12.02.07 18:12 >>>
> >On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 07:30:55AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>
> >> As the topic says - the goal is to support Xen. But yes, I was afraid
> >> someone would
> >> claim this
>>> Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12.02.07 18:12 >>>
>On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 07:30:55AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> As the topic says - the goal is to support Xen. But yes, I was afraid
>> someone would
>> claim this make the code look ugly. And no, I currently don't have ideas to
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 07:30:55AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> As the topic says - the goal is to support Xen. But yes, I was afraid someone
> would
> claim this make the code look ugly. And no, I currently don't have ideas to
> address
> any of your comments without breaking functionality on
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:14:25AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Xen the linux guest
> or
> Xen the hypervisor?
>
> if it's the later, why on earth would we want to uglyfy linux for it?
> (arguably it holds in the former case as well)
Xen the hypervisor (i.e., dom0).
Cheers,
Muli
-
To
>> > If Jan actually had a goal with that except making the code utterly
>> > unreadable he should try again with small patches that are well
>> > explained and do one thing at a at time. (And cane be reviewed an
>> > improved on if needed.
>>
>> As the topic says - the goal is to support Xen.
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 07:30 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:32:54AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 07:59:18AM +, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> > > [IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)
> > >
&
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 07:30 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:32:54AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 07:59:18AM +, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
[IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)
Add abstraction so that the file
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:14:25AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Xen the linux guest
or
Xen the hypervisor?
if it's the later, why on earth would we want to uglyfy linux for it?
(arguably it holds in the former case as well)
Xen the hypervisor (i.e., dom0).
Cheers,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe
If Jan actually had a goal with that except making the code utterly
unreadable he should try again with small patches that are well
explained and do one thing at a at time. (And cane be reviewed an
improved on if needed.
As the topic says - the goal is to support Xen.
Xen the linux
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 07:30:55AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
As the topic says - the goal is to support Xen. But yes, I was afraid someone
would
claim this make the code look ugly. And no, I currently don't have ideas to
address
any of your comments without breaking functionality on
Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12.02.07 18:12
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 07:30:55AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
As the topic says - the goal is to support Xen. But yes, I was afraid
someone would
claim this make the code look ugly. And no, I currently don't have ideas to
address
any of
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 07:27 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12.02.07 18:12
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 07:30:55AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
As the topic says - the goal is to support Xen. But yes, I was afraid
someone would
claim this make the code look
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:32:54AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 07:59:18AM +, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> > [IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)
> >
> > Add abstraction so that the file can be used by environments
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:32:54AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 07:59:18AM +, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
[IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)
Add abstraction so that the file can be used by environments other than
IA64
sorry, this should of course go to the people to blame aswell :)
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:32:54AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 07:59:18AM +, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> > [IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)
> >
> >
sorry, this should of course go to the people to blame aswell :)
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:32:54AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 07:59:18AM +, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
[IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)
Add abstraction so
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 07:59:18AM +, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> [IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)
>
> Add abstraction so that the file can be used by environments other than
> IA64
> and EM64T, namely for Xen.
Tony, this code is more than
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 07:59:18AM +, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
[IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)
Add abstraction so that the file can be used by environments other than
IA64
and EM64T, namely for Xen.
Tony, this code is more than ugly, and even further
18 matches
Mail list logo
