On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:31:40 +1100
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 12:29:29PM +1100, herbert wrote:
> >
> > This one moves the dst->child processing from dst_ifdown into
> > xfrm_dst_ifdown.
>
> This patch adds a net_device argument to ifdown. After all,
> it's a
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 12:29:29PM +1100, herbert wrote:
>
> This one moves the dst->child processing from dst_ifdown into
> xfrm_dst_ifdown.
This patch adds a net_device argument to ifdown. After all,
it's a bit silly to notify someone of an ifdown event without
telling them what which device i
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 05:51:17PM +1100, herbert wrote:
>
> The idea is to move the check into dst->ops->ifdown. By definition
> ipv6_dst_ifdown will only see rt6_info entries. So dst_dev_event
> will become
Here are the patches to do this. Do they look sane?
This one moves the dst->child pr
3 matches
Mail list logo