On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 07:10:05AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> Hrm... not on yet. Herbert, care to resend, looks like it fell down the
> wrong hole in Linus mailbox :-)

Thanks for the reminder Ben.  Here it is again:

[IRQ]: Fix synchronize_irq races with IRQ handler

As it is some callers of synchronize_irq rely on memory barriers
to provide synchronisation against the IRQ handlers.  For example,
the tg3 driver does

        tp->irq_sync = 1;
        smp_mb();
        synchronize_irq();

and then in the IRQ handler:

        if (!tp->irq_sync)
                netif_rx_schedule(dev, &tp->napi);

Unfortunately memory barriers only work well when they come in
pairs.  Because we don't actually have memory barriers on the
IRQ path, the memory barrier before the synchronize_irq() doesn't
actually protect us.

In particular, synchronize_irq() may return followed by the
result of netif_rx_schedule being made visible.

This patch (mostly written by Linus) fixes this by using spin
locks instead of memory barries on the synchronize_irq() path.

Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 80eab7a..1f31422 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -29,12 +29,28 @@
 void synchronize_irq(unsigned int irq)
 {
        struct irq_desc *desc = irq_desc + irq;
+       unsigned int status;
 
        if (irq >= NR_IRQS)
                return;
 
-       while (desc->status & IRQ_INPROGRESS)
-               cpu_relax();
+       do {
+               unsigned long flags;
+
+               /*
+                * Wait until we're out of the critical section.  This might
+                * give the wrong answer due to the lack of memory barriers.
+                */
+               while (desc->status & IRQ_INPROGRESS)
+                       cpu_relax();
+
+               /* Ok, that indicated we're done: double-check carefully. */
+               spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
+               status = desc->status;
+               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
+
+               /* Oops, that failed? */
+       } while (status & IRQ_INPROGRESS);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(synchronize_irq);
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to