Hi Johannes,
Sorry for the late reply, I was travelling around the world ...
I have now tested the =2 and =4 settings at home, with the following
outcome:
On Do, 12 Jul 2012, Johannes Berg wrote:
> With the latest, I've extended 11n_disable to have more bits.
>
> 11n_disable=1 will disable HT
Hi Johannes,
Sorry for the late reply, I was travelling around the world ...
I have now tested the =2 and =4 settings at home, with the following
outcome:
On Do, 12 Jul 2012, Johannes Berg wrote:
With the latest, I've extended 11n_disable to have more bits.
11n_disable=1 will disable HT
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 17:14 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > I can actually work now wirelessly, and in case of hangs an rfkill block
> > rfkill unblock practically always, and mostly is not needed.
>
> Ok, that was said *UNTIL* I reenabled 11n. Up to now I was loading the
> iwlwifi module
In preach for decent iwl driver ...
On Do, 28 Jun 2012, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > You seem to be on 3.5.0-rc now, is that really no different from 3.4?
>
> The feeling is that it is definitely better.
>
> I can actually work now wirelessly, and in case of hangs an rfkill block
> rfkill
In preach for decent iwl driver ...
On Do, 28 Jun 2012, Norbert Preining wrote:
You seem to be on 3.5.0-rc now, is that really no different from 3.4?
The feeling is that it is definitely better.
I can actually work now wirelessly, and in case of hangs an rfkill block
rfkill unblock
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 17:14 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
I can actually work now wirelessly, and in case of hangs an rfkill block
rfkill unblock practically always, and mostly is not needed.
Ok, that was said *UNTIL* I reenabled 11n. Up to now I was loading the
iwlwifi module with
6 matches
Mail list logo
