Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

2014-05-16 Thread Jörg Otte
2014-05-16 13:53 GMT+02:00 Ville Syrjälä : > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 06:38:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 05:21:49PM +0200, Jörg Otte wrote: >> > 2014-05-13 15:22 GMT+02:00 Daniel Vetter : >> > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:38:41PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > >> On

Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

2014-05-16 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 06:38:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 05:21:49PM +0200, Jörg Otte wrote: > > 2014-05-13 15:22 GMT+02:00 Daniel Vetter : > > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:38:41PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > >> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Jörg Otte wrote:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

2014-05-13 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 05:46:31PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 06:38:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > Doesn't work for me, I still have an underrun at boot-up. > > > > I'm at a loss tbh with ideas. We successfully disable both pipes, then > > enable pipe A and it a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

2014-05-13 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 06:38:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Doesn't work for me, I still have an underrun at boot-up. > > I'm at a loss tbh with ideas. We successfully disable both pipes, then > enable pipe A and it all works. > > Then we enable pipe B and _both_ pipes underrun immediately

Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

2014-05-13 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 05:21:49PM +0200, Jörg Otte wrote: > 2014-05-13 15:22 GMT+02:00 Daniel Vetter : > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:38:41PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Jörg Otte wrote: > >> >>> Branch drm-intel-nightly as of > >> >>> ed60c27 drm-intel-nigh

Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

2014-05-13 Thread Jörg Otte
2014-05-13 15:22 GMT+02:00 Daniel Vetter : > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:38:41PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Jörg Otte wrote: >> >>> Branch drm-intel-nightly as of >> >>> ed60c27 drm-intel-nightly: 2014y-05m-09d-21h-51m-45s integration manifest >> >>> looks badl

Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

2014-05-13 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:38:41PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Jörg Otte wrote: > >>> Branch drm-intel-nightly as of > >>> ed60c27 drm-intel-nightly: 2014y-05m-09d-21h-51m-45s integration manifest > >>> looks badly: > >>>- KDE splash screen on boot-up is not

Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

2014-05-13 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:38:41PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Jörg Otte wrote: >> >>> Branch drm-intel-nightly as of >> >>> ed60c27 drm-intel-nightly: 2014y-05m-09d-21h-51m-45s integration manifest >> >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

2014-05-13 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:38:41PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Jörg Otte wrote: > >>> Branch drm-intel-nightly as of > >>> ed60c27 drm-intel-nightly: 2014y-05m-09d-21h-51m-45s integration manifest > >>> looks badly: > >>>- KDE splash screen on boot-up is not

Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

2014-05-13 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Jörg Otte wrote: >>> Branch drm-intel-nightly as of >>> ed60c27 drm-intel-nightly: 2014y-05m-09d-21h-51m-45s integration manifest >>> looks badly: >>>- KDE splash screen on boot-up is not visible >>>- x-windows don't have title and menu bars >>>- KDE s

Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

2014-05-13 Thread Jörg Otte
2014-05-12 21:03 GMT+02:00 Daniel Vetter : > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 01:25:24PM +0200, Jörg Otte wrote: >> 2014-05-11 18:49 GMT+02:00 Daniel Vetter : >> > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Jörg Otte wrote: >> >>> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 05:14:38PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: >> On Fri, May 0

Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

2014-05-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 01:25:24PM +0200, Jörg Otte wrote: > 2014-05-11 18:49 GMT+02:00 Daniel Vetter : > > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Jörg Otte wrote: > >>> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 05:14:38PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 06:11:37PM +0200, Jörg Otte wrote: > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

2014-05-12 Thread Jörg Otte
2014-05-11 18:49 GMT+02:00 Daniel Vetter : > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Jörg Otte wrote: >>> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 05:14:38PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 06:11:37PM +0200, Jörg Otte wrote: > > Jörg, can you please boot with drm.debug=0xe, reproduce the i

Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

2014-05-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Jörg Otte wrote: >> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 05:14:38PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: >>> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 06:11:37PM +0200, Jörg Otte wrote: >>> > > Jörg, can you please boot with drm.debug=0xe, reproduce the issue and >>> > > then attach the complete dmesg?

Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

2014-05-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > Please don't make things more prominent if the fixes can't be merged > without rewriting the world, > > Distros have auto reporting tools for the major backtrace warnings, > and releasing kernels with unfixable ones in it make it hard to know >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

2014-05-10 Thread Jörg Otte
2014-05-09 19:03 GMT+02:00 Ville Syrjälä : > On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 05:14:38PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: >> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 06:11:37PM +0200, Jörg Otte wrote: >> > > Jörg, can you please boot with drm.debug=0xe, reproduce the issue and >> > > then attach the complete dmesg? Please make

Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

2014-05-09 Thread Dave Airlie
On 10 May 2014 03:03, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 05:14:38PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: >> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 06:11:37PM +0200, Jörg Otte wrote: >> > > Jörg, can you please boot with drm.debug=0xe, reproduce the issue and >> > > then attach the complete dmesg? Please make

Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

2014-05-09 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 05:14:38PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 06:11:37PM +0200, Jörg Otte wrote: > > > Jörg, can you please boot with drm.debug=0xe, reproduce the issue and > > > then attach the complete dmesg? Please make sure that the dmesg > > > contains the boot-up s

Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.14.0-rc4] regression: drm FIFO underruns

2014-05-09 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 06:11:37PM +0200, Jörg Otte wrote: > > Jörg, can you please boot with drm.debug=0xe, reproduce the issue and > > then attach the complete dmesg? Please make sure that the dmesg > > contains the boot-up stuff too. > > > > Thanks, Daniel > Here it is. I should mention it only