Re: [Intel-gfx] [KERNEL] Regression bug in drm/i915, Wrong assumption in commit e11aa36 breaks suspend on at least lenovo x61

2015-02-19 Thread Imre Deak
On to, 2015-02-19 at 15:42 +, Dave Gordon wrote: > On 19/02/15 11:08, Deak, Imre wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 10:47 +, Dave Gordon wrote: > >> On 18/02/15 16:24, Imre Deak wrote: > >>> On ke, 2015-02-18 at 17:39 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen wrote:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [KERNEL] Regression bug in drm/i915, Wrong assumption in commit e11aa36 breaks suspend on at least lenovo x61

2015-02-19 Thread Dave Gordon
On 19/02/15 11:08, Deak, Imre wrote: > On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 10:47 +, Dave Gordon wrote: >> On 18/02/15 16:24, Imre Deak wrote: >>> On ke, 2015-02-18 at 17:39 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see

Re: [Intel-gfx] [KERNEL] Regression bug in drm/i915, Wrong assumption in commit e11aa36 breaks suspend on at least lenovo x61

2015-02-19 Thread Imre Deak
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 10:47 +, Dave Gordon wrote: > On 18/02/15 16:24, Imre Deak wrote: > > On ke, 2015-02-18 at 17:39 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > >>> After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to > >>> v3.18.7. I think it

Re: [Intel-gfx] [KERNEL] Regression bug in drm/i915, Wrong assumption in commit e11aa36 breaks suspend on at least lenovo x61

2015-02-19 Thread Dave Gordon
On 18/02/15 16:24, Imre Deak wrote: > On ke, 2015-02-18 at 17:39 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen wrote: >>> After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to >>> v3.18.7. I think it should also apply to the current head. With that >>> patch,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [KERNEL] Regression bug in drm/i915, Wrong assumption in commit e11aa36 breaks suspend on at least lenovo x61

2015-02-19 Thread Dave Gordon
On 18/02/15 16:24, Imre Deak wrote: On ke, 2015-02-18 at 17:39 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen klaus+l...@ethgen.de wrote: After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to v3.18.7. I think it should also apply to the current head. With that

Re: [Intel-gfx] [KERNEL] Regression bug in drm/i915, Wrong assumption in commit e11aa36 breaks suspend on at least lenovo x61

2015-02-19 Thread Imre Deak
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 10:47 +, Dave Gordon wrote: On 18/02/15 16:24, Imre Deak wrote: On ke, 2015-02-18 at 17:39 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen klaus+l...@ethgen.de wrote: After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to v3.18.7. I

Re: [Intel-gfx] [KERNEL] Regression bug in drm/i915, Wrong assumption in commit e11aa36 breaks suspend on at least lenovo x61

2015-02-19 Thread Dave Gordon
On 19/02/15 11:08, Deak, Imre wrote: On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 10:47 +, Dave Gordon wrote: On 18/02/15 16:24, Imre Deak wrote: On ke, 2015-02-18 at 17:39 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen klaus+l...@ethgen.de wrote: After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert

Re: [Intel-gfx] [KERNEL] Regression bug in drm/i915, Wrong assumption in commit e11aa36 breaks suspend on at least lenovo x61

2015-02-19 Thread Imre Deak
On to, 2015-02-19 at 15:42 +, Dave Gordon wrote: On 19/02/15 11:08, Deak, Imre wrote: On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 10:47 +, Dave Gordon wrote: On 18/02/15 16:24, Imre Deak wrote: On ke, 2015-02-18 at 17:39 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen klaus+l...@ethgen.de

Re: [Intel-gfx] [KERNEL] Regression bug in drm/i915, Wrong assumption in commit e11aa36 breaks suspend on at least lenovo x61

2015-02-18 Thread Imre Deak
On ke, 2015-02-18 at 17:39 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > > After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to > > v3.18.7. I think it should also apply to the current head. With that > > patch, suspend is working again on that version.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [KERNEL] Regression bug in drm/i915, Wrong assumption in commit e11aa36 breaks suspend on at least lenovo x61

2015-02-18 Thread Imre Deak
On ke, 2015-02-18 at 17:39 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen klaus+l...@ethgen.de wrote: After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to v3.18.7. I think it should also apply to the current head. With that patch, suspend is working again on