On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:24:52AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:02:48AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Instead of just a flag bit for each of the positive/negative sync
> > modes drm actually uses a separate flag for each ... This upsets the
> > modeset checker since th
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:38:24PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:02:48AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Instead of just a flag bit for each of the positive/negative sync
> > modes drm actually uses a separate flag for each ... This upsets the
> > modeset checker since th
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:02:48AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Instead of just a flag bit for each of the positive/negative sync
> modes drm actually uses a separate flag for each ... This upsets the
> modeset checker since the adjusted mode filled out at modeset time
> doesn't match the one reco
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:02:48AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Instead of just a flag bit for each of the positive/negative sync
> modes drm actually uses a separate flag for each ... This upsets the
> modeset checker since the adjusted mode filled out at modeset time
> doesn't match the one reco
4 matches
Mail list logo