On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
>>> > The cap exposes the max cursor size. Knowing our hardware we can infer
>>> > that pot sizes from 64 to max are supported, but it would be better if
>>> > we did expose that info
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> > The cap exposes the max cursor size. Knowing our hardware we can infer
>> > that pot sizes from 64 to max are supported, but it would be better if
>> > we did expose that information through the cap as well.
>>
>> I think the right approac
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:55:40AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> >> Realized after sending mail that we just get to know current cursor
> >> width and height. Can we have capability that exposes all supported
> >> cursor sizes?
> >
> > The
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> Realized after sending mail that we just get to know current cursor
>> width and height. Can we have capability that exposes all supported
>> cursor sizes?
>
> The cap exposes the max cursor size. Knowing our hardware we can infer
> that pot
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 12:37:49AM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-03-09 at 00:34 +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
> > On Sat, 2014-03-08 at 13:51 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 1:49 PM, wrote:
> > > > From: Sagar Kamble
> > > >
> > > > With this patch we a
5 matches
Mail list logo
