Re: [Intel-gfx] [REGRESSION] Linux 4.9-rc4: gfx glitches on Intel Sandybridge (was: Re: Linux 4.9-rc4)

2016-11-09 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Mittwoch, 9. November 2016, 11:42:36 CET schrieb Jani Nikula: > > *However*, I got a soft freeze and a hard freeze (well after about a > > minute I gave up and rebooted by pressing power button long enough to > > forcefully switch off the laptop) when playing PlaneShift using > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [REGRESSION] Linux 4.9-rc4: gfx glitches on Intel Sandybridge (was: Re: Linux 4.9-rc4)

2016-11-09 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Mittwoch, 9. November 2016, 11:42:36 CET schrieb Jani Nikula: > > *However*, I got a soft freeze and a hard freeze (well after about a > > minute I gave up and rebooted by pressing power button long enough to > > forcefully switch off the laptop) when playing PlaneShift using > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [REGRESSION] Linux 4.9-rc4: gfx glitches on Intel Sandybridge (was: Re: Linux 4.9-rc4)

2016-11-09 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 09 Nov 2016, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Also no graphics glitches with external DisplayPort connected display. Thanks for confirming this. The fix should make it to -rc5. > *However*, I got a soft freeze and a hard freeze (well after about a > minute I gave up and

Re: [Intel-gfx] [REGRESSION] Linux 4.9-rc4: gfx glitches on Intel Sandybridge (was: Re: Linux 4.9-rc4)

2016-11-09 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 09 Nov 2016, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Also no graphics glitches with external DisplayPort connected display. Thanks for confirming this. The fix should make it to -rc5. > *However*, I got a soft freeze and a hard freeze (well after about a > minute I gave up and rebooted by pressing

Re: [Intel-gfx] [REGRESSION] Linux 4.9-rc4: gfx glitches on Intel Sandybridge (was: Re: Linux 4.9-rc4)

2016-11-09 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Dienstag, 8. November 2016, 16:17:59 CET schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > Am Dienstag, 8. November 2016, 16:11:31 CET schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > > Am Montag, 7. November 2016, 19:09:36 CET schrieb Jani Nikula: > > > On Mon, 07 Nov 2016, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > > > It

Re: [Intel-gfx] [REGRESSION] Linux 4.9-rc4: gfx glitches on Intel Sandybridge (was: Re: Linux 4.9-rc4)

2016-11-09 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Dienstag, 8. November 2016, 16:17:59 CET schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > Am Dienstag, 8. November 2016, 16:11:31 CET schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > > Am Montag, 7. November 2016, 19:09:36 CET schrieb Jani Nikula: > > > On Mon, 07 Nov 2016, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > > > It is also the same

Re: [Intel-gfx] [REGRESSION] Linux 4.9-rc4: gfx glitches on Intel Sandybridge (was: Re: Linux 4.9-rc4)

2016-11-08 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Dienstag, 8. November 2016, 16:11:31 CET schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > Am Montag, 7. November 2016, 19:09:36 CET schrieb Jani Nikula: > > On Mon, 07 Nov 2016, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > > It is also the same kind of corruptions as shown in > > > > > > [Bug 177701]

Re: [Intel-gfx] [REGRESSION] Linux 4.9-rc4: gfx glitches on Intel Sandybridge (was: Re: Linux 4.9-rc4)

2016-11-08 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Dienstag, 8. November 2016, 16:11:31 CET schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > Am Montag, 7. November 2016, 19:09:36 CET schrieb Jani Nikula: > > On Mon, 07 Nov 2016, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > > It is also the same kind of corruptions as shown in > > > > > > [Bug 177701] warning in

Re: [Intel-gfx] [REGRESSION] Linux 4.9-rc4: gfx glitches on Intel Sandybridge (was: Re: Linux 4.9-rc4)

2016-11-08 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Montag, 7. November 2016, 19:09:36 CET schrieb Jani Nikula: > On Mon, 07 Nov 2016, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > It is also the same kind of corruptions as shown in > > > > [Bug 177701] warning in intel_dp_aux_transfer > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [REGRESSION] Linux 4.9-rc4: gfx glitches on Intel Sandybridge (was: Re: Linux 4.9-rc4)

2016-11-08 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Montag, 7. November 2016, 19:09:36 CET schrieb Jani Nikula: > On Mon, 07 Nov 2016, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > It is also the same kind of corruptions as shown in > > > > [Bug 177701] warning in intel_dp_aux_transfer > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177701 > > > > Just

Re: [Intel-gfx] [REGRESSION] Linux 4.9-rc4: gfx glitches on Intel Sandybridge (was: Re: Linux 4.9-rc4)

2016-11-07 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Montag, 7. November 2016, 19:09:36 CET schrieb Jani Nikula: > On Mon, 07 Nov 2016, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > It is also the same kind of corruptions as shown in > > > > [Bug 177701] warning in intel_dp_aux_transfer > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [REGRESSION] Linux 4.9-rc4: gfx glitches on Intel Sandybridge (was: Re: Linux 4.9-rc4)

2016-11-07 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Montag, 7. November 2016, 19:09:36 CET schrieb Jani Nikula: > On Mon, 07 Nov 2016, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > It is also the same kind of corruptions as shown in > > > > [Bug 177701] warning in intel_dp_aux_transfer > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177701 > > > > Just

Re: [Intel-gfx] [REGRESSION] Linux 4.9-rc4: gfx glitches on Intel Sandybridge (was: Re: Linux 4.9-rc4)

2016-11-07 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 07 Nov 2016, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > It is also the same kind of corruptions as shown in > > [Bug 177701] warning in intel_dp_aux_transfer > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177701 > > Just compare > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [REGRESSION] Linux 4.9-rc4: gfx glitches on Intel Sandybridge (was: Re: Linux 4.9-rc4)

2016-11-07 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 07 Nov 2016, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > It is also the same kind of corruptions as shown in > > [Bug 177701] warning in intel_dp_aux_transfer > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177701 > > Just compare > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=241801 > > with > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [REGRESSION] Linux 4.9-rc4: gfx glitches on Intel Sandybridge (was: Re: Linux 4.9-rc4)

2016-11-07 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Montag, 7. November 2016, 13:04:16 CET schrieb Jani Nikula: > On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Am Samstag, 5. November 2016, 16:46:33 CET schrieb Linus Torvalds: > >> So it's once again a Saturday afternoon rather than Sunday, this time > >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [REGRESSION] Linux 4.9-rc4: gfx glitches on Intel Sandybridge (was: Re: Linux 4.9-rc4)

2016-11-07 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Montag, 7. November 2016, 13:04:16 CET schrieb Jani Nikula: > On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Am Samstag, 5. November 2016, 16:46:33 CET schrieb Linus Torvalds: > >> So it's once again a Saturday afternoon rather than Sunday, this time > >> because I felt this

Re: [Intel-gfx] [REGRESSION] Linux 4.9-rc4: gfx glitches on Intel Sandybridge (was: Re: Linux 4.9-rc4)

2016-11-07 Thread Jani Nikula
On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Hi. > > Am Samstag, 5. November 2016, 16:46:33 CET schrieb Linus Torvalds: >> So it's once again a Saturday afternoon rather than Sunday, this time >> because I felt this rc was already big enough. > > With kernel 4.9-rc4 I saw

Re: [Intel-gfx] [REGRESSION] Linux 4.9-rc4: gfx glitches on Intel Sandybridge (was: Re: Linux 4.9-rc4)

2016-11-07 Thread Jani Nikula
On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Hi. > > Am Samstag, 5. November 2016, 16:46:33 CET schrieb Linus Torvalds: >> So it's once again a Saturday afternoon rather than Sunday, this time >> because I felt this rc was already big enough. > > With kernel 4.9-rc4 I saw gfx corruptions like