Re: [Intel-gfx] 3.14.3 i915 dead display under X11

2014-05-14 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:43:53PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 09:19:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:47:38PM +0200, Bruno Prémont wrote: > >> > CCing intel-gfx as otherwise it will probably

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3.14.3 i915 dead display under X11

2014-05-14 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:43:53PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 09:19:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:47:38PM +0200, Bruno Prémont wrote: > >> > CCing intel-gfx as otherwise it will probably

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3.14.3 i915 dead display under X11

2014-05-14 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 09:19:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:47:38PM +0200, Bruno Prémont wrote: >> > CCing intel-gfx as otherwise it will probably not get seen by developers. >> > >> > On Sun, 11 May 2014 Carbonated

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3.14.3 i915 dead display under X11

2014-05-14 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 09:19:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:47:38PM +0200, Bruno Prémont wrote: > > CCing intel-gfx as otherwise it will probably not get seen by developers. > > > > On Sun, 11 May 2014 Carbonated Beverage > > wrote: > > > Bisecting from 3.13.6 (goo

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3.14.3 i915 dead display under X11

2014-05-14 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:47:38PM +0200, Bruno Prémont wrote: > CCing intel-gfx as otherwise it will probably not get seen by developers. > > On Sun, 11 May 2014 Carbonated Beverage > wrote: > > Bisecting from 3.13.6 (good) to 3.14.3 (bad) ended up with... > > > > commit b35684b8fa94e04f55fd38bf