Re: [KJ] Re: [PATCH] bugfix GFP_KERNEL -> GFP_ATOMIC in spin_locked region

On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:31:42 +0200 Yoann Padioleau wrote: > Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Am Dienstag, 5. Juni 2007 13:05 schrieb Yoann Padioleau: > >> Ok. Do you have a preference on the format ?  a : format  ? > >> > >> Is there a place that gathered all those implicit progra

Re: [KJ] Re: [PATCH] bugfix GFP_KERNEL -> GFP_ATOMIC in spin_locked region

Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Am Dienstag, 5. Juni 2007 13:05 schrieb Yoann Padioleau: >> Ok. Do you have a preference on the format ?  a : format  ? >> >> Is there a place that gathered all those implicit programming rules >> (that copy_from_user must not be called inside a spinlo

Re: [KJ] Re: [PATCH] bugfix GFP_KERNEL -> GFP_ATOMIC in spin_locked region

On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:05:18 +0200 Yoann Padioleau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> > >> net/wan/lmc/lmc_main.c|2 +- > >> scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c |2 +- > >> usb/serial/io_ti.c|2 +- > >> usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_

Re: [KJ] Re: [PATCH] bugfix GFP_KERNEL -> GFP_ATOMIC in spin_locked region

Am Dienstag, 5. Juni 2007 13:05 schrieb Yoann Padioleau: > Ok. Do you have a preference on the format ?  a : format  ? > > Is there a place that gathered all those implicit programming rules > (that copy_from_user must not be called inside a spinlock, etc) so that > I can translate them in a scri

Re: [KJ] Re: [PATCH] bugfix GFP_KERNEL -> GFP_ATOMIC in spin_locked region

Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> net/wan/lmc/lmc_main.c|2 +- >> scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c |2 +- >> usb/serial/io_ti.c|2 +- >> usb/serial/ti_usb_3410_5052.c |2 +- >> usb/serial/whiteheat.c|6 +++--- >> 5 files changed, 7 inser