Hello Dmitry,
Wednesday, May 2, 2007, 12:17:33 AM, you wrote:
> Hello Paul,
> Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
>>> ASIC-related code (I mean core) forms additional platform layer, so I
>>> suggest
>>> adding ASIC helpers to generic platform code i.e. drivers/platform.c, but
>>> ASIC drivers to drivers/asi
Hello Paul,
Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
>> ASIC-related code (I mean core) forms additional platform layer, so I
>> suggest
>> adding ASIC helpers to generic platform code i.e. drivers/platform.c, but
>> ASIC drivers to drivers/asic/ directory.
>
> There problem here is the same - our target ch
Hello Dmitry,
Tuesday, May 1, 2007, 10:08:23 PM, you wrote:
> ian wrote:
>> On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 20:29 +0400, Dmitry Krivoschekov wrote:
>>> If you used ASIC acronym it would be more appropriate and not so
>>> ambiguous.
>>
>> Actually, thats not bad. I'd be ok with that is SoC isnt used.
>>
>
ian wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 20:29 +0400, Dmitry Krivoschekov wrote:
>> If you used ASIC acronym it would be more appropriate and not so
>> ambiguous.
>
> Actually, thats not bad. I'd be ok with that is SoC isnt used.
>
I'm ok with that too, i.e. very rough definition is:
SoC (system-on-chip
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 20:29 +0400, Dmitry Krivoschekov wrote:
> If you used ASIC acronym it would be more appropriate and not so
> ambiguous.
Actually, thats not bad. I'd be ok with that is SoC isnt used.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
Hello Dmitry,
Tuesday, May 1, 2007, 7:38:44 PM, you wrote:
> ian wrote:
>> On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 17:53 +0400, Dmitry Krivoschekov wrote:
>>> Hi Paul,
>>
>>> I think your referring to the term "SoC (system-on-chip)" is confusing
>>> (at least for me). You rather consider companion chips than SoCs.
ian wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 17:53 +0400, Dmitry Krivoschekov wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>
>> I think your referring to the term "SoC (system-on-chip)" is confusing
>> (at least for me). You rather consider companion chips than SoCs.
>
> A 'System' does not imply a CPU. A 'Computer System' would but
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 17:53 +0400, Dmitry Krivoschekov wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> I think your referring to the term "SoC (system-on-chip)" is confusing
> (at least for me). You rather consider companion chips than SoCs.
A 'System' does not imply a CPU. A 'Computer System' would but the word
system itse
8 matches
Mail list logo
