Re: [LKP] [xfs] a5949d3fae: aim7.jobs-per-min -33.6% regression

2020-07-22 Thread Xing Zhengjun
On 7/7/2020 2:30 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 03:49:52PM +0800, Xing Zhengjun wrote: On 6/10/2020 11:07 AM, Xing Zhengjun wrote: Hi Darrick,    Do you have time to take a look at this? Thanks. Ping... Yes, that decrease is the expected end result of making th

Re: [LKP] [xfs] a5949d3fae: aim7.jobs-per-min -33.6% regression

2020-07-06 Thread Darrick J. Wong
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 03:49:52PM +0800, Xing Zhengjun wrote: > > > On 6/10/2020 11:07 AM, Xing Zhengjun wrote: > > Hi Darrick, > > > >    Do you have time to take a look at this? Thanks. > > > > > Ping... Yes, that decrease is the expected end result of making the write path take a longer

Re: [LKP] [xfs] a5949d3fae: aim7.jobs-per-min -33.6% regression

2020-07-01 Thread Xing Zhengjun
On 6/10/2020 11:07 AM, Xing Zhengjun wrote: Hi Darrick,    Do you have time to take a look at this? Thanks. Ping... On 6/6/2020 11:48 PM, kernel test robot wrote: Greeting, FYI, we noticed a -33.6% regression of aim7.jobs-per-min due to commit: commit: a5949d3faedf492fa7863b914da4

Re: [LKP] [xfs] a5949d3fae: aim7.jobs-per-min -33.6% regression

2020-06-09 Thread Xing Zhengjun
Hi Darrick, Do you have time to take a look at this? Thanks. On 6/6/2020 11:48 PM, kernel test robot wrote: Greeting, FYI, we noticed a -33.6% regression of aim7.jobs-per-min due to commit: commit: a5949d3faedf492fa7863b914da408047ab46eb0 ("xfs: force writes to delalloc regions to unwrit