On 10/13/2020 11:01 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
On 10/12/20 6:59 PM, Xing Zhengjun wrote:
On 10/13/2020 1:40 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
On 10/11/20 10:29 PM, Xing Zhengjun wrote:
Hi Mike,
I re-test it in v5.9-rc8, the regression still existed. It is almost the
same as 34ae204f1851. Do you
On 10/12/20 6:59 PM, Xing Zhengjun wrote:
>
>
> On 10/13/2020 1:40 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> On 10/11/20 10:29 PM, Xing Zhengjun wrote:
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> I re-test it in v5.9-rc8, the regression still existed. It is almost
>>> the same as 34ae204f1851. Do you have time to look at it? Tha
On 10/13/2020 1:40 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
On 10/11/20 10:29 PM, Xing Zhengjun wrote:
Hi Mike,
I re-test it in v5.9-rc8, the regression still existed. It is almost the
same as 34ae204f1851. Do you have time to look at it? Thanks.
Thank you for testing.
Just curious, did you apply th
On 10/11/20 10:29 PM, Xing Zhengjun wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
>I re-test it in v5.9-rc8, the regression still existed. It is almost the
> same as 34ae204f1851. Do you have time to look at it? Thanks.
>
Thank you for testing.
Just curious, did you apply the series in this thread or just test v5.9
Hi Mike,
I re-test it in v5.9-rc8, the regression still existed. It is almost
the same as 34ae204f1851. Do you have time to look at it? Thanks.
=
tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/runtime/size/
On 8/21/20 2:02 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> Would you be willing to test this series on top of 34ae204f1851? I will need
> to rebase the series to take the changes made by 34ae204f1851 into account.
Actually, the series in this thread will apply/run cleanly on top of
34ae204f1851. No need to rebas
On 8/21/20 1:39 AM, Xing Zhengjun wrote:
>
>
> On 6/26/2020 5:33 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> On 6/22/20 3:01 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>>> On 6/21/20 5:55 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
Greeting,
FYI, we noticed a -33.4% regression of vm-scalability.throughput due to
commit:
On 6/26/2020 5:33 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
On 6/22/20 3:01 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
On 6/21/20 5:55 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
Greeting,
FYI, we noticed a -33.4% regression of vm-scalability.throughput due to commit:
commit: c0d0381ade79885c04a04c303284b040616b116e ("hugetlbfs: use i_mmap
8 matches
Mail list logo
