Re: [LKP] Re: [mm] 10befea91b: hackbench.throughput -62.4% regression

2021-02-12 Thread Roman Gushchin
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 01:19:47PM +0800, Xing Zhengjun wrote: > > > On 2/3/2021 10:49 AM, Roman Gushchin wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 04:18:27PM +0800, Xing, Zhengjun wrote: > > > On 1/14/2021 11:18 AM, Roman Gushchin wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:51:51AM +0800, kernel test rob

Re: [LKP] Re: [mm] 10befea91b: hackbench.throughput -62.4% regression

2021-02-04 Thread Roman Gushchin
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 01:19:47PM +0800, Xing Zhengjun wrote: > > > On 2/3/2021 10:49 AM, Roman Gushchin wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 04:18:27PM +0800, Xing, Zhengjun wrote: > > > On 1/14/2021 11:18 AM, Roman Gushchin wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:51:51AM +0800, kernel test rob

Re: [LKP] Re: [mm] 10befea91b: hackbench.throughput -62.4% regression

2021-02-02 Thread Roman Gushchin
On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 04:18:27PM +0800, Xing, Zhengjun wrote: > > > On 1/14/2021 11:18 AM, Roman Gushchin wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:51:51AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > Greeting, > > > > > > FYI, we noticed a -62.4% regression of hackbench.throughput due to commit: > > Hi!