Re: [LSF/MM ATTEND ] memory reclaim with NUMA rebalancing

2019-02-23 Thread Fengguang Wu
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 09:27:48PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:19:47PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: Michal Hocko writes: Hi, I would like to propose the following topic for the MM track. Different group of people would like to use NVIDMMs as a low cost & slower mem

Re: [LSF/MM ATTEND ] memory reclaim with NUMA rebalancing

2019-02-23 Thread Fengguang Wu
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:19:47PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: Michal Hocko writes: Hi, I would like to propose the following topic for the MM track. Different group of people would like to use NVIDMMs as a low cost & slower memory which is presented to the system as a NUMA node. We do have

Re: [LSF/MM ATTEND ] memory reclaim with NUMA rebalancing

2019-02-22 Thread Larry Woodman
On 02/06/2019 02:03 PM, Christopher Lameter wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jan 2019, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > >> I would be interested in this topic too. I would like to >> understand the API and how it can help exploit the different type of >> devices we have on OpenCAPI. Same here, we/RedHat have quite a b

Re: [LSF/MM ATTEND ] memory reclaim with NUMA rebalancing

2019-02-06 Thread Christopher Lameter
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > I would be interested in this topic too. I would like to > understand the API and how it can help exploit the different type of > devices we have on OpenCAPI. So am I. We may want to rethink the whole NUMA API and the way we handle different types of

[LSF/MM ATTEND ] memory reclaim with NUMA rebalancing

2019-01-30 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
Michal Hocko writes: > Hi, > I would like to propose the following topic for the MM track. Different > group of people would like to use NVIDMMs as a low cost & slower memory > which is presented to the system as a NUMA node. We do have a NUMA API > but it doesn't really fit to "balance the memor