On 05.09.2014 12:39, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 05/09/14 11:13, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 05 September 2014 10:47:30 Marc Zyngier wrote:
I still prefer being explicit here for the same reason I mentioned earlier:
I want it to be very clear that we don't support arbitrary irqchips other
On 05/09/14 11:13, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 05 September 2014 10:47:30 Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>
>>> I still prefer being explicit here for the same reason I mentioned earlier:
>>> I want it to be very clear that we don't support arbitrary irqchips other
>>> than the ones in the APCI
On 05.09.2014 12:13, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 05 September 2014 10:47:30 Marc Zyngier wrote:
I still prefer being explicit here for the same reason I mentioned earlier:
I want it to be very clear that we don't support arbitrary irqchips other
than the ones in the APCI specification.
On Friday 05 September 2014 10:47:30 Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >
> > I still prefer being explicit here for the same reason I mentioned earlier:
> > I want it to be very clear that we don't support arbitrary irqchips other
> > than the ones in the APCI specification. The infrastructure exists on DT
>
On Friday 05 September 2014 10:47:30 Marc Zyngier wrote:
I still prefer being explicit here for the same reason I mentioned earlier:
I want it to be very clear that we don't support arbitrary irqchips other
than the ones in the APCI specification. The infrastructure exists on DT
because
On 05.09.2014 12:13, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 05 September 2014 10:47:30 Marc Zyngier wrote:
I still prefer being explicit here for the same reason I mentioned earlier:
I want it to be very clear that we don't support arbitrary irqchips other
than the ones in the APCI specification.
On 05/09/14 11:13, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 05 September 2014 10:47:30 Marc Zyngier wrote:
I still prefer being explicit here for the same reason I mentioned earlier:
I want it to be very clear that we don't support arbitrary irqchips other
than the ones in the APCI specification. The
On 05.09.2014 12:39, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 05/09/14 11:13, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 05 September 2014 10:47:30 Marc Zyngier wrote:
I still prefer being explicit here for the same reason I mentioned earlier:
I want it to be very clear that we don't support arbitrary irqchips other
On 1 September 2014 19:35, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>
> On 01/09/14 15:57, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > From: Tomasz Nowicki
> >
> > ACPI kernel uses MADT table for proper GIC initialization. It needs to
> > parse GIC related subtables, collect CPU interface and distributor
> > addresses and call driver
On 1 September 2014 19:35, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On 01/09/14 15:57, Hanjun Guo wrote:
From: Tomasz Nowicki tomasz.nowi...@linaro.org
ACPI kernel uses MADT table for proper GIC initialization. It needs to
parse GIC related subtables, collect CPU interface and
10 matches
Mail list logo
