Re: [Linaro-acpi] How to pass I2C platform_data under ACPI

2014-04-03 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 03 April 2014 13:59:18 Pallala, Ramakrishna wrote: > >> We definitely don't want per-board match entries, that does not scale. > >> The driver should be reasonably generic and get all the necessary data > >> out of well-defined tables. You can have different IDs when there are > >>

RE: [Linaro-acpi] How to pass I2C platform_data under ACPI

2014-04-03 Thread Pallala, Ramakrishna
>> > > And initialize the platform data in either driver or in separate >> > > module which gets compiled along with driver? >> > >> > Typically it has been done in the same driver but I don't see any >> > problems having a separate module as well. >> > >> > > static const struct

Re: [Linaro-acpi] How to pass I2C platform_data under ACPI

2014-04-03 Thread mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 03:34:30PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 03 April 2014 14:38:33 mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 11:25:34AM +, Pallala, Ramakrishna wrote: > > > >> In non ACPI environment I used to initialize the platform_data under > > >

Re: [Linaro-acpi] How to pass I2C platform_data under ACPI

2014-04-03 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 03 April 2014 14:38:33 mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com wrote: > On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 11:25:34AM +, Pallala, Ramakrishna wrote: > > >> In non ACPI environment I used to initialize the platform_data under > > >> board or platforms files. Under ACPI how do I do that? > > > > > >If

Re: [Linaro-acpi] How to pass I2C platform_data under ACPI

2014-04-03 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 03 April 2014 14:38:33 mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 11:25:34AM +, Pallala, Ramakrishna wrote: In non ACPI environment I used to initialize the platform_data under board or platforms files. Under ACPI how do I do that? If you can't

Re: [Linaro-acpi] How to pass I2C platform_data under ACPI

2014-04-03 Thread mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 03:34:30PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Thursday 03 April 2014 14:38:33 mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 11:25:34AM +, Pallala, Ramakrishna wrote: In non ACPI environment I used to initialize the platform_data under board or

RE: [Linaro-acpi] How to pass I2C platform_data under ACPI

2014-04-03 Thread Pallala, Ramakrishna
And initialize the platform data in either driver or in separate module which gets compiled along with driver? Typically it has been done in the same driver but I don't see any problems having a separate module as well. static const struct acpi_device_id my_acpi_match[] = {

Re: [Linaro-acpi] How to pass I2C platform_data under ACPI

2014-04-03 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 03 April 2014 13:59:18 Pallala, Ramakrishna wrote: We definitely don't want per-board match entries, that does not scale. The driver should be reasonably generic and get all the necessary data out of well-defined tables. You can have different IDs when there are only a few