Hey,
Op 14-02-13 11:22, Arnd Bergmann schreef:
> On Thursday 07 February 2013, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>
> Hi Maarten,
>
> I cannot help a lot on this patch set, but there are a few things that
> I noticed when reading it.
>
>> Functions:
>> --
>>
>> mutex_reserve_lock, and
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>> These functions will return -EDEADLK instead of -EAGAIN if
>> reservation_id is the same as the reservation_id that's attempted to
>> lock the mutex with, since in that case you presumably attempted to
>> lock the same lock
On Thursday 07 February 2013, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Hi Maarten,
I cannot help a lot on this patch set, but there are a few things that
I noticed when reading it.
> Functions:
> --
>
> mutex_reserve_lock, and mutex_reserve_lock_interruptible:
> Lock a buffer with a reservation_id
On Thursday 07 February 2013, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Hi Maarten,
I cannot help a lot on this patch set, but there are a few things that
I noticed when reading it.
Functions:
--
mutex_reserve_lock, and mutex_reserve_lock_interruptible:
Lock a buffer with a reservation_id set.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
These functions will return -EDEADLK instead of -EAGAIN if
reservation_id is the same as the reservation_id that's attempted to
lock the mutex with, since in that case you presumably attempted to
lock the same lock
Hey,
Op 14-02-13 11:22, Arnd Bergmann schreef:
On Thursday 07 February 2013, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Hi Maarten,
I cannot help a lot on this patch set, but there are a few things that
I noticed when reading it.
Functions:
--
mutex_reserve_lock, and
6 matches
Mail list logo