Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH v3 2/3] mutex: add support for wound/wait style locks, v3

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> 2. Do you really want to drop the *_slow variants? >> Doing so might reduce debugging slightly. I like method #2 in >> ww-mutex-design.txt, it makes it very clear why you >> would handle the *_slow case differently anyway. > As you

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH v3 2/3] mutex: add support for wound/wait style locks, v3

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankho...@canonical.com wrote: 2. Do you really want to drop the *_slow variants? Doing so might reduce debugging slightly. I like method #2 in ww-mutex-design.txt, it makes it very clear why you would handle the *_slow case