On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
>>> +static void ww_test_spin_nest_unlocked(void)
>>> +{
>>> +raw_spin_lock_nest_lock(_A, );
>>> +U(A);
>>> +}
>> I don't quite see the point of this one here ...
> It's a lockdep test that was missing. o.base is not locked. So
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Maarten Lankhorst
maarten.lankho...@canonical.com wrote:
+static void ww_test_spin_nest_unlocked(void)
+{
+raw_spin_lock_nest_lock(lock_A, o.base);
+U(A);
+}
I don't quite see the point of this one here ...
It's a lockdep test that was missing.
2 matches
Mail list logo