On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 05:48:26PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> For OCFS2 that would mean that an ocfs2_nodemanager would still exist,
> but as a much smaller module sitting on top of 'nodemanager'.
Yep, factoring out the common bits.
> So no port attribute. The OCFS2 network code normally takes p
Hi David,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 02:15:53PM +0800, David Teigland wrote:
> Some of the comments about the dlm concerned how it's configured (from
> user space.) In particular, there was interest in seeing the dlm and
> ocfs2 use common methods for their configuration.
>
> The first area I'm loo
On Monday 18 July 2005 16:15, David Teigland wrote:
> I've taken a stab at generalizing ocfs2_nodemanager so the dlm could use
> it (removing ocfs-specific stuff). It still needs some work, but I'd
> like to know if this appeals to the ocfs group and to others who were
> interested in seeing some
3 matches
Mail list logo
