On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 11:39 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 10/8/07, Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 22:43 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > BTW, what path do framebuffer patches take to get into Linus' tree?
> > > Does he pull your tree directly, or do they g
On 10/8/07, Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 22:43 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > BTW, what path do framebuffer patches take to get into Linus' tree?
> > Does he pull your tree directly, or do they go through someone else's
> > tree?
>
> They all go to -mm tree,
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 22:43 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 10/2/07, Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 09:57 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > Assuming there are no major issues, I'd like to get this patch series
> > > queued up for inclusion in 2.6.24.
> >
> >
On 10/2/07, Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 09:57 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > Assuming there are no major issues, I'd like to get this patch series
> > queued up for inclusion in 2.6.24.
>
> Okay.
>
> Tony
BTW, what path do framebuffer patches take to get i
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 09:57 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> (resend due to mailer issues. Apologies to anyone receiving this twice)
>
> This patch series reworks the Xilinx framebuffer driver and then adds
> an of_platform bus binding. The of_platform bus binding is needed to use
> the driver in ar
5 matches
Mail list logo
