wakeup_level4_pgt need to be updated in addtion to boot_level4_pgt?
also comment could be updated for good unstanding too.
YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/maj
On 12/12/06, Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/head.S b/arch/x86_64/kernel/head.S
index 1e6f808..2f65469 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/head.S
+++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/head.S
@@ -328,9 +328,9 @@ ENTRY(wakeup_level4_pgt)
.align PAGE_SIZE
ENTRY(b
"Yinghai Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 12/8/06, Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Your or I missed a bug fix/enhancement in there somewhere.
>>
>
> I found the problem. the __set_fixmap need to __va, so the entries
> will be referred from PAGE_OFFSET.
>
> solution will be
>
On 12/8/06, Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your or I missed a bug fix/enhancement in there somewhere.
I found the problem. the __set_fixmap need to __va, so the entries
will be referred from PAGE_OFFSET.
solution will be
1. move enable_dbgp_console from setup_early_printk, and
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 07:16:09PM -0800, Lu, Yinghai wrote:
> It works in LinuxBIOS now.
Cool, can't wait to try it out.
Good work!
//Peter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vge
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 11:42 PM
>> With Eric code in LinuxBIOS, it will report "No device found in debug
>> port"
>Hmm. At least this is partial progress :)
It works in LinuxBIOS now. It will loop all connect
"Yinghai Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 12/7/06, Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ugh. I'd check the code. But it looks like my tweak to the
>> early fixmap code. But my hunch is that my tweak to __fixmap
>> so that it's pud and pmd were prepopulated didn't take on
>> your
On 12/7/06, Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ugh. I'd check the code. But it looks like my tweak to the
early fixmap code. But my hunch is that my tweak to __fixmap
so that it's pud and pmd were prepopulated didn't take on
your build.
I missed some options?
YH
-
To unsubscribe f
On 12/7/06, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ugh, no, never use the usb-serial driver as a console device.
That was a bad hack done as a bet many years ago. For many obvious
reasons it does not work well.
understood, I found with usb_serial convertor could lose some chatacter.
but the usb-de
"Lu, Yinghai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>>Ok due to popular demands here is the slightly fixed patch that works
>>on both i386 and x86_64. For the i386 version you must not ha
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 07:48:17PM -0800, Lu, Yinghai wrote:
> With Greg's USB Debug, host and target can talk.
> target with console=ttyUSB0,115200n8
Ugh, no, never use the usb-serial driver as a console device.
That was a bad hack done as a bet many years ago. For many obvious
reasons it does
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Ok due to popular demands here is the slightly fixed patch that works
>on both i386 and x86_64. For the i386 version you must not have
>HIGHMEM64G enabled.
>I just rolled it all into on
Two side are identical if two side are connected.
YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 01:08:14PM -0800, Lu, Yinghai wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Andi Kleen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 12:59 PM
>
> >I haven't looked how the other usb_debug works -- if it's polled
> >too then it wouldn't have much advantage.
>
What do you mean by
+ for (reps = 0; reps >= 0; reps++) {
?
If you will not reps is negative. Roughly it is a loop
that will timeout eventually if a usb debug cable is not present.
So since I didn't know how many loop iterations made sense I allowed
it to loop for 2^31 times or until r
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 3:50 PM
>If you will not reps is negative. Roughly it is a loop
>that will timeout eventually if a usb debug cable is not present.
>Putting some deliberate delays in there so I could
"Lu, Yinghai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 3:01 AM
>
>>+static int ehci_wait_for_port(int port)
>>+{
>>+ unsigned status;
>>+ int ret, reps;
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 3:01 AM
>+static int ehci_wait_for_port(int port)
>+{
>+ unsigned status;
>+ int ret, reps;
>+ for (reps = 0; reps >= 0; reps++) {
>+
18 matches
Mail list logo
