On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:35:22PM -0600, Reg Clemens wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:55:58AM -0600, Reg Clemens wrote:
> > >
> > > Just one point with your patch.
> > > A couple of years ago there was a long discussion on the Linux Kernel
> > > mailing
> > > list
> > > as to how USER code
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:55:58AM -0600, Reg Clemens wrote:
> >
> > Just one point with your patch.
> > A couple of years ago there was a long discussion on the Linux Kernel
> > mailing
> > list
> > as to how USER codes were not supposed to use KERNEL include files. Now I
> > still
> > see
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:55:58AM -0600, Reg Clemens wrote:
>
> Just one point with your patch.
> A couple of years ago there was a long discussion on the Linux Kernel mailing
> list
> as to how USER codes were not supposed to use KERNEL include files. Now I
> still
> see __KERNEL__ all over t
Just one point with your patch.
A couple of years ago there was a long discussion on the Linux Kernel mailing
list
as to how USER codes were not supposed to use KERNEL include files. Now I
still
see __KERNEL__ all over the place in the linux=source includes so mabe this
never went anywhere, but
4 matches
Mail list logo
