Re: [Linuxarm] Re: [PATCH for next v1 0/2] gpio: few clean up patches to replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock

2021-02-11 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:42 PM Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy Shevchenko [mailto:andy.shevche...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 3:57 AM > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:50:45AM +, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote: > > > > -Or

RE: [Linuxarm] Re: [PATCH for next v1 0/2] gpio: few clean up patches to replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock

2021-02-10 Thread Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
t:GPIO SUBSYSTEM ; Linux Kernel Mailing > List ; linux...@openeuler.org > Subject: Re: [Linuxarm] Re: [PATCH for next v1 0/2] gpio: few clean up patches > to replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:50:45AM +, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote: >

Re: [Linuxarm] Re: [PATCH for next v1 0/2] gpio: few clean up patches to replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock

2021-02-10 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:50:45AM +, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Andy Shevchenko [mailto:andy.shevche...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2021 11:51 PM > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 5:43 AM luojiaxing wrote: > > > On 2021/2/9 17:42, Andy

RE: [Linuxarm] Re: [PATCH for next v1 0/2] gpio: few clean up patches to replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock

2021-02-10 Thread Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
BSYSTEM > ; Linux Kernel Mailing List > ; linux...@openeuler.org > Subject: [Linuxarm] Re: [PATCH for next v1 0/2] gpio: few clean up patches to > replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 5:43 AM luojiaxing wrote: > > On 2021/2/9 17:42, Andy Shev