Peter Rival wrote:
> "David S. Miller" wrote:
>
> > J Sloan writes:
> > > Microsoft finally managed to get a better result using
> > > an all-out, "bet the farm", "benchmark buster" setup
> > > with a special web cache in front of iis.
> >
> > I haven't heard anyone talk about the fact that th
"David S. Miller" wrote:
> Peter Rival writes:
> > Really? I just checked and it's still there from what I see. We're talking
> > about the Dell 8450/700 w/ IIS & SWC 3.0 result, right? I'm hoping that
> > they're deemed NC, but I don't see it yet...
>
> Sorry, they are there in the table,
Peter Rival writes:
> Really? I just checked and it's still there from what I see. We're talking
> about the Dell 8450/700 w/ IIS & SWC 3.0 result, right? I'm hoping that
> they're deemed NC, but I don't see it yet...
Sorry, they are there in the table, but marked as NC.
Maybe you need to
"David S. Miller" wrote:
> J Sloan writes:
> > Microsoft finally managed to get a better result using
> > an all-out, "bet the farm", "benchmark buster" setup
> > with a special web cache in front of iis.
>
> I haven't heard anyone talk about the fact that their 8-cpu numbers
> got disqualifie
J Sloan writes:
> Microsoft finally managed to get a better result using
> an all-out, "bet the farm", "benchmark buster" setup
> with a special web cache in front of iis.
I haven't heard anyone talk about the fact that their 8-cpu numbers
got disqualified and aren't even mentioned on the SPE
Ronald Bultje wrote:
> On 18 May 2001 10:12:34 +0200, reiser.angus wrote:
> > > However, taking a closer look, it turns out, that the above statement
> > > holds true only for 1 and 2 processor machines. Scalability already
> > > suffers at 4 processors, and at 8 processors, TUX 2.0 (7500) gets b
6 matches
Mail list logo
